At risk of derailing, I wanted to answer a particular point of yours here @CryptoFascistMadameCholet .
I don't think there is anything controversial about what you point out. But those of us who object to another point entirely are often wrongly assumed to be objecting to what you've said.
I think two claims are often mixed up.
Firstly, that there are observable patterns, as you point out.
Secondly, that the police failed to tackle one particular group because of political correctness/fear of appearing racist.
I would say that the first claim is obviously true, as you've shown. The second is obviously bullshit, and was just an excuse used by various police forces - an excuse readily accepted by the kind of people who claim "you can't say anything without being called racist".
My problem with this is that people like me, who criticise the second claim, are accused of denying the first claim (that patterns do exist and should be recognised in order to prevent and prosecute crime) and castigated as do gooders and paedophile enablers, or accused ourselves of seeing racism everywhere and using it to avoid hard questions.
It seems true to me that "Tommy Robinson types" are indeed often coming at this from a racist angle (NOTE I DON'T MEAN POSIE PARKER) otherwise they would be just animated about other types of paedophillia committed disproportionately by white people, and it should be okay to say that without being accused of being on the side of rapists.