I didn't say it wasn't a good piece - just that he's as likely to argue the opposite if the winds change tomorrow. He's a professional contrarian and those people are dangerous - even the ones who (unlike B O'N, who knows exactly what he's doing) who think they're just stirring things up a bit, Puck-like - keeping things interesting.
Besides, there are lots of good pieces (by, for eg, actual feminists who aren't going to throw women under a bus if that's what 'counterintuitive and disruptive' looks like tomorrow) that we could be celebrating; this feels like the kind of gratitude for a bit of male critical attention which characterises some corners of the GC landscape.
Anyone who had anything to do with the RCP in the 80s will understand my unwillingness to pat O'Neill on the back for anything.