Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Miriam Cates is on Politics Live today, 25 January.

140 replies

MoirasSaggyBundles · 25/01/2023 11:19

Hoping Miriam gets a chance to address the odious attack on her by Lloyd Russell Moyles, and the conviction yesterday of the double rapist who claims he's a woman.

OP posts:
MoirasSaggyBundles · 26/01/2023 09:01

Well quite. Trans rapist prisoner like the one currently under discussion won't even be the "most vulnerable" in a male prison.

Blame Blanchard et al as treating women as a control group/validation service. It started with him.

OP posts:
Lottapianos · 26/01/2023 09:07

'robust risk assessment , that includes, asking the prisoner where they want to be housed and if it would affect their mental health .'

Fuck sake. How absolutely pathetic. Women being treated like we don't even exist, yet again

MoirasSaggyBundles · 26/01/2023 09:08

Julia Hartley Brewer going to discuss this on Talk TV with Debbie Hayton in the next half hour.

OP posts:
Signalbox · 26/01/2023 09:32

According to Twitter Yvette Cooper has spoken out against this rapist going into a female prison on R4 today program. I can’t find a clip though.

ResisterRex · 26/01/2023 09:36

Signal I posted about Radio 4 on another thread. I'm not too excited tbh, and I can see lot of applause for "this dangerous rapist should not be in a woman's prison" but her answer to the second question isn't cause for immediate celebration IMO.

Nick Robinson and Yvette Cooper:

NR: you raised the issue of violence against women and girls. You'll know that there's a controversial case in Scotland - different legal system, different government, of course - in which a man called Adam Graham who raped two women is identifying as a woman and says he wants to serve his sentence in a women's prison. Now, that would not be possible as I understand it under English law, if Labour gets into government, do you agree that it should not be possible for a man who chooses to identify as a woman - someone who's still anatomically male - to serve their sentence in a woman's prison?

YC: this dangerous rapist should not be in a woman's prison. I think it should be really clear cut, if someone poses a danger to women, has committed crimes against women, they should not be being housed among women prisoners. I think that...that should just be straightforward and I think most people would agree with that.

NR: So, the fact that they identify as a woman, the fact that this person - Isla Bryson - is called in court, a woman, is referred to as "she" - all that should be ignored, and "she" - if she is she - should not serve in a woman's prison, in your view?

YC: There...there is...the Equality Act already provides for recognising that there is a difference between, between gender and whether...however that's legally recognised, and also for biological sex, and provides for there to be safe spaces for biological women, and prisons is one of the cases that's been highlighted as part of that. So, I think this has been something that's been long - you know, had those arrangements in place in the law, and it's right that there should be so. It is possible to, er, have a framework that both supports who are vulnerable who are trans, and also makes sure there are protections for women in these sorts of circumstances.

SinnerBoy · 26/01/2023 09:44

Lottapianos · Today 09:07

'robust risk assessment , that includes, asking the prisoner where they want to be housed and if it would affect their mental health .'

I read that part of the risk assessment is: "Is the prisoner at risk from the women in the prison?"

It seems likely that, if the answer is no, then it's a green light. If that's not the very definition of "totally fucked up," then I don't know what is.

yestheyhavethesamedad · 26/01/2023 09:49

For those interested the transcript from the sps on tv last night

Transcript of conversation for those that cannot watch it , rona dougall started by saying gordon cree interviewing fiona cruikshank head of operations of prisons , about the very SMALL number of transwoman in prison

Gordon Cree : why would it be that someone that is biologically male and who has been convicted of rape , would be taken to a womans prison?

Fiona Cruikshank: So any transgender person who is admitted into custody, is admitted into the establishment that matches their identified gender, that they were living in within the community.

GC: so at the moment does the prison service look for a gender recognition certificate or is it just how the prisoner chooses how to identify themselves?

FC : It's how they choose to identify and how they have been living in the community.

GC: Do u understand why people will be concerned about that , particularly in the case of sex offenders?

FC: Absolutely , however there is a robust risk assessment process , that the prison service will go thru. So just because someone has been admitted into a particular prison does not mean that will be their prison of allocation following that risk assessment .

GC: So essentially once the risk assessment has taken place , what factors are looked at there?

FC: So em , we consider a number of factors , so we have to balance the welfare , the needs and the rights of the individual themself, as well as the welfare and safety of others around them.
Em , so shortly after admission we will conduct a multi disciplinary case conference and em carry out a risk assessment.
So factors we consider are the identified gender of the individual, how they were living in the community , WHERE THE INDIVIDUAL THEMSELVES WANT TO BE PLACED. We will also consider criminal history .

So that will look at their index offence , their previous convictions and we will take into considerations any risk factors that may pose a threat to individuals of a particular gender, we will also consider any pre sentencing reports that are available , and again look at the risk factors , and any particular groups that may be at risk.

Em, we will also consider the mental health of the individual and if their mental health will be exarcerbated or negatively impacted if placed within a particular area, em and we will consider the safety of the individual themself, so have they been the subject of any gender based violence .

GC: Could it every be the case that a biological male , who is choosing to identify as a woman and it appears in some cases that all it takes , them choosing to , that has used their penis to rape a woman , could ever be in a situation where they come into contact with female prisoners in the prison system , could that happen ?

FC: em It could , but only following a robust risk assessment , em so if we feel someone poses a particular risk , then we have the opportuniry to keep them seperate from the general population , until that risk assessment is done.
If the decision is then made to integrate into the main stream and associate with OTHER woman , then that would be done in a very slow and staged process .It would be monitored and supervised very closely and would be reviewed regularly.

GC: Back in 2019 when the concerns were raised about the way transgender prisoners were being placed in womans prisons , stv was told by scottish prison service that the policy and the way it happens was being reviewed. Has that review taken place , have things changed in that time or are we using the same guidance ?

FC: The em ,gender reassignment policy has been reviewed and its just going thru the final stages at the moment , before thats then published.

GC: I guess to some extend , a lot of these decisions are about how you manage sex offenders in the prison system , rather than it being specifically about transgender people.

FC: I can't speak about individual cases , but when we look at someones criminal history in terms of index offence and previous convictions, then if they have been convicted of a sex offence and previous convictions , then if they have been convicted of a sex offence, and there are obvious risks associated with that , that will be taken into consideration during the risk assessment .

GC: Does that mean they would stay in isolation or does it mean they would go into a male prison

FC: em, each case would be decided on an individual basis , based on the specific risks to the individual and from that individual .

SinnerBoy · 26/01/2023 10:01

She is saying that the good mental health of one outweighs the poor mental health of the many. How does she square that one?

PerilousErection · 26/01/2023 10:19

SinnerBoy · 26/01/2023 10:01

She is saying that the good mental health of one outweighs the poor mental health of the many. How does she square that one?

It can only be because she's never going to be that one.

Or the old n+1 argument.

Why is no one talking about the male prisoners who claimed to be trans and applied to go in the female estate and were refused? Are there any?

teawamutu · 26/01/2023 10:23

PerilousErection · 26/01/2023 10:19

It can only be because she's never going to be that one.

Or the old n+1 argument.

Why is no one talking about the male prisoners who claimed to be trans and applied to go in the female estate and were refused? Are there any?

What a good question. Worth an FOI?

RudsyFarmer · 26/01/2023 10:34

ResisterRex · 25/01/2023 12:13

Clip of Blunkett. Enjoy it before he's sent off to Re-Education to fix his Wrong Think!!

twitter.com/haggis_uk/status/1618218718743658496?s=12

Gosh I could have listened to so much more of that. Thank you so much David.

RudsyFarmer · 26/01/2023 10:48

Ridemeginger · 25/01/2023 18:28

KJK on GB News discussing the Scottish rapist:

Why has she decided to make her office look like disco? I think it somewhat detracts from the message sadly.

duc748 · 26/01/2023 11:27

MoirasSaggyBundles · 26/01/2023 08:24

The trouble is, "the most vulnerable" has been trotted out repeatedly over the years as a way of TRAs getting their opponent on the immediate back foot in any discussion. Any GC person must then tug the forelock and provide the caveat about making sure all trans people are safe, etc etc. And to be fair, most GC women have in their mind the vulnerable kids who are being encouraged to arrest their development with puberty blockers and lop off body parts. The problem with the trans umbrella is all the chancers and paraphillia parading blokes with plenty of power, who are certainly not vulnerable.

I think GC commentators have to be armed in any discussion to push back immediately on this claim, case by case. So no, a trans child is not more vulnerable than any other child in school, all children can fall prey to abuse, so we must treat all children as being equally vulnerable and not give certain children a special status at the expense of others. No, there is no scenario where a convicted rapist is more vulnerable than a woman who is in prison for crimes related to her own abuse and poverty. No, I reject the premise that a transwoman in sport has more vulnerability than a woman because of his trans status, the physical advantages of male puberty give this person an unfair advantage, the trans part is a red herring. And so on.

And every time we are asked whether we care about trans people, we need to push back. We care about women's rights, we care about children's safety. Trans is a red herring. Having an identity is a matter of social acceptance, but social acceptance does not trump safeguarding.

Or something like that. We have been too kind. I am sick to the stomach that we are having to seriously justify why we don't think a male rapist should be put in a woman's prison.

This, absolutely. Well said! The cynicism of hiding behind the skirts of young messed-up girls is disgusting.

flyingbuttress43 · 26/01/2023 11:55

Piers Morgan - long interview with Rosie Duffield

www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3uYxVUS_-4

MoirasSaggyBundles · 26/01/2023 15:01

Miriam Cates talking with Brendan O'Neill for Spiked.

OP posts:
RoyalCorgi · 26/01/2023 15:19

flyingbuttress43 · 26/01/2023 11:55

Piers Morgan - long interview with Rosie Duffield

www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3uYxVUS_-4

Is anybody else loving the way that Rosie Duffield is coming out of this smelling (appropriately) of roses? Poor Rosie has had to put up with so much shit for so long and now people are starting to recognise what a hero she is, while Starmer and co are scrabbling round like idiots trying to find a way of pretending that of course no one in the Labour Party thinks it's OK to put men in women's prisons. Of course not.

OldCrone · 26/01/2023 15:54

Starmer and co are scrabbling round like idiots trying to find a way of pretending that of course no one in the Labour Party thinks it's OK to put men in women's prisons. Of course not.

Unfortunately for him, at least one MP has been filmed saying that rapists should be allowed to go to women's prisons if they want to.

duc748 · 26/01/2023 16:22

My MP. 🙁

All those fine words butter no parsnips if you're still going to parrot "TWAW".

Namechangedforthisonetoday · 26/01/2023 18:42

OldCrone · 26/01/2023 15:54

Starmer and co are scrabbling round like idiots trying to find a way of pretending that of course no one in the Labour Party thinks it's OK to put men in women's prisons. Of course not.

Unfortunately for him, at least one MP has been filmed saying that rapists should be allowed to go to women's prisons if they want to.

Lisa Nandy is an ejit. I truly truly believe that she made a fuck up a few years ago on GMB (I think it was) where she couldn’t explain what a man or a woman was. She was falling over herself, tying herself up in word salad knots, terrified of saying the ‘wrong’ thing. I watched that interview with my toes curled. It was hilarious. I think since then she’s been scared to say what she truly thinks. I do not believe LN deep deep down thinks TWAW and trans rapists should be allowed to go into Womens prisons. I think she’s just gone so far with this now she has to take it all the way. Think of it a bit like when Pam pretended to be a vegetarian in Gavin and Stacey. She had to keep up with the premise. It’s quite funny actually when you think about it. Poor Lisa, what a wally 😂.

MoirasSaggyBundles · 26/01/2023 19:21

Is it this one? She is as thick as mince.

OP posts:
Namechangedforthisonetoday · 26/01/2023 20:08

MoirasSaggyBundles · 26/01/2023 19:21

Is it this one? She is as thick as mince.

Hahaha yes that’s it, she reminds me of Nicola Murray from The Thick of It, just completely hapless. Where is Malcolm Tucker when you need him?!

duc748 · 26/01/2023 20:11

I do not believe LN deep deep down thinks TWAW and trans rapists should be allowed to go into Womens prisons. I think she’s just gone so far with this now she has to take it all the way

I agree. That's what annoys me about her. She voted Remain, obviously thought Brexit a bad idea, but can't admit that now and comes out with all this "Let's make Brexit work" bollocks. And the same with the trans issue. If you don't say what you mean and mean what you say, you end up looking ridiculous.

And she is touted as a future leader. 🙄

WarriorN · 27/01/2023 09:11

I think GC commentators have to be armed in any discussion to push back immediately on this claim, case by case. So no, a trans child is not more vulnerable than any other child in school, all children can fall prey to abuse, so we must treat all children as being equally vulnerable and not give certain children a special status at the expense of others.

Coming back to this; I agree with you but the latest keeping children safe in education does specifically name some groups of children who are more vulnerable to abuse, including lgbt.

Heads will hone in on that

WarriorN · 27/01/2023 09:12

And there's a nice little gang of academics at the moment pushing and publishing the extremely vulnerable narrative in education research.

WarriorN · 27/01/2023 09:14

These are the key pages:

Miriam Cates is on Politics Live today, 25 January.
Miriam Cates is on Politics Live today, 25 January.
Miriam Cates is on Politics Live today, 25 January.
Swipe left for the next trending thread