The irony is how blind people are to the obvious mental health costs to people who don't believe in gender identity; especially for those who have previous or ongoing experience of any kind of relational trauma (family, school bullying, abusive relationships)
Anyone who can't force themselves to radically alter their sense of reality (if they don't naturally believe in gender id), and who also has any experience of being bullied, silenced, coerced, gaslit, made to collude, surrounded by enablers, isolated, excluded, or forced to lie or keep secrets will feel traumatised by aspects of what's happening in the culture or in closer environments.
(I'm not saying its only those with trauma/family dysfunction who are experiencing disturbance, just that it might be more familiar and distressing to those who have, or who are aware of the dynamics)
The reality is that many of us just can't turn our sense of reality upside down as we are being asked (told) to- in a way that nothing else ever has.
Even if we really wanted to because we thought it would make life easier if we could choose to believe it's really just 'live and let live' and that we are fundamentally an identity rather than embodied beings. (I tried to choose to believe in Christianity once, so I could authentically be a godparent- and to see if it was possible. Interesting experience but didn't work)
I think many of us might have started with the cognitive dissonance and confusion (again, especially if the dynamics and tactics were familiar), and really tried to question our thinking and instinctive responses, and 'did the research'. But, what I was left with was an even clearer sense of what felt true and real and how at odds that was with the apparently new consensus (and expectations). And then felt even more disturbed!
If you are unable to speak or question freely, feel forced to conform, or to deny your own reality, how is it possible to 'live your best life', 'be true to yourself/the authentic you', or to ' feel relief from distress' and 'improved mental health' that are the supposed rights (?) for all?
Instead of having any costs, losses, or effects acknowledged, there is only vilification.
It seems like an impossible situation. If subjective truth and lived experience is paramount now, how exactly is this being reconciled?
I would say, maybe if this could be raised and discussed more openly it could open the door for some shared empathy and understanding- some resolution where a compromise could be reached.
Then I realise that's what JKR tried to do with her essay.