Hmmm. I mean, any head you're speaking to will be way more knowledgeable about ofsted and safeguarding than most people- so throwing those words round randomly will not strike the fear of god into them. It may make you look like a tit, however.
In the sense that safeguarding random ofsteds in a sentence with "safeguarding" and "Ofsted" would definitely make you ofsted like a tit, you are safeguarding right, Horse. 😁I'm not sure that's exactly what the poster had in mind, though - I suspect women here, who have taken the time to educate themselves, have the resources at their fingertips and are consciously girding themselves for a possible fight have an unusually good command of their arguments. As I read it, the point was more about focusing on the clear, legitimate and evidence-based ways that this relates to safeguarding and Ofsted's guidance - rather than, say, getting diverted into women's sports or rapists in women's prisons. And although I would absolutely hope that headteachers would be the experts in this stuff, even if we didn't have a wealth of evidence to suggest they're not always completely aware of the issues, it would be naive to think that every one of them has the time and headspace (or inclination) to think about this carefully and become experts. That's why, presumably, they outsource PSHE in the first place. And Valancy for one can testify to the fact that when some teachers do get better information they see the dangers and change course.
Thank you all for suggestions! I've got Transgender Trend and SSA (and Spielman's replies to Miriam Cates) bookmarked in case this develops further... Not to mention Forstater but 🤞 we won't get that far. (No offence, Maya. 😁) I love the nursery otherwise and am hoping against hope that as soon as they realise there's an issue they'll decide it's simply not worth arguing about. Wish me luck...