Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

School LGBTQ+ staff survey

79 replies

BlackAlys · 25/10/2022 22:48

The secondary school I work in has had a huge drive towards LGBTQ+ matters for about 2 years now. We have rainbows and flags everywhere, our PSE lessons are heavily weighed towards trans issues and now, a staff survey has arrived asking us how comfortable we are with challenging homophobic and transphobic behaviour.

It also asks whether we understand what deadnaming is and whether we feel confident to address the issue with pupils, would we quietly deal with it or would we report pupils officially on the school system.

Its final 2 questions are about our awareness of the term cisgender and assesses our confidence to discuss these terms with pupils.

I'm really unhappy with the heavy emphasis on this whole issue. I'd have no problem tackling homophobic/transphobic behaviour but I see cis and cisgender as offensive, made up terms that are slowly being shoe-horned into normality. There isn't a space to comment neither so my only option is to not fill it in.

I am anticipating the large (and growing) group of LGBTQ+pupils to want more PSE lessons on trans issues. Id like to be able to say my piece succinctly and to the point but I'm lost for words.

OP posts:
LaughingPriest · 30/10/2022 13:48

grey12 · 30/10/2022 09:35

@DeadDonkey are you OP?

I honestly I don't get the issue with saying "cis" 🤷🏻‍♀️ Maybe there is no real need in most situations but opposing it so strongly? Why?.... it's just language no1. And when saying that "transwomen are women", I do think there is indeed a need to define ciswomen, since "biological women" doesn't seem to be PC anymore 🤦🏻‍♀️

What would a woman whose gender "matches" female actually look, feel and behave like to meet that definition, in your view?

What characteristics are female?

Please be specific.

LaughingPriest · 30/10/2022 13:51

FrippEnos · 30/10/2022 13:34

Its weird, when I started teaching, part of the job was to get children/teenagers to realise that they should not be constrained by the stereotypes pushed on to them by others,
Girls could do science, Boys could do textiles.
Girls could be engineers and boys could be nurses.

Now it seems to be that in order to do something you have to conform to the correct gender.

Exactly. GC people largely believe that a woman is a female, with any personality/ appearance/ level of femininity.

Trans ideology says that a woman is a certain type of appearance/ personality etc (not sure exactly what, as they refuse to specify) of any sex.

I find the latter far more restrictive and gatekeeping than the former.

BlackAlys · 30/10/2022 15:07

FrippEnos · 30/10/2022 13:34

Its weird, when I started teaching, part of the job was to get children/teenagers to realise that they should not be constrained by the stereotypes pushed on to them by others,
Girls could do science, Boys could do textiles.
Girls could be engineers and boys could be nurses.

Now it seems to be that in order to do something you have to conform to the correct gender.

This, yes.

OP posts:
Charley50 · 30/10/2022 18:23

Hi OP, I'm sure you know this; the interim Cass review, and now the new NHS Guidance, has made it clear the social transitioning is not a 'neutral act', and that it can be actively harmful.

Single Sex spaces are allowed under the Equality Act. Apparently Sunak is tightening this up.

The recent Mermaids scandal and the Tavistock being closed down; both show the safeguarding issues for children.

All of the above should make it easier to raise these issues with SMT, and for them to actually listen to you.

I agree that many other discriminated against groups are being neglected, with the focus being so much on T, and I think this would also be a good point to raise.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread