Paul Brand / ITV falsely says LGBAlliance opposes transgender rights

[ChristinaXYZ]

If anyone fancies complaining

twitter.com/BevJacksonAuth/status/1577717075665195008

I have no idea. For Stonewall it's another cash cow. Create a label, then create the illusion of discrimination, and then raise more money.

It's like people calling themselves non-binary, and inventing a need for rights (like a new sex option on forms) and then calling discrimination when it doesn't exist.

Isn’t Mishy the poster who claimed that Matthew Paris didn’t know much about Gay Rights history?

Fuck sake. I’m asexual and it’s nobody’s business, and it’s not something I feel the need to go shouting about, as it impacts on my human rights in precisely zero ways.

www.cbsnews.com/news/david-sedaris-on-coming-out-all-over-again/?ftag=CNM-00-10aab8c&linkId=185816832

I was ‘kinda’ shocked to hear that one woman described herself ‘queer’ because she was tall…

But then again, we telling posters like Mishy that queer is an umbrella term for anyone now. Anyone who wants it. So, when Mishy declares ’yeah well you aint queer dear. x’, it is meaningless.

I find it remarkable that on one hand a poster can declare that they are LGB and that LGB Alliance doesn’t ‘nothing’ for them. And then slips into using ‘queer’ as if LGB Alliance should be working for ‘queer’ people’s interests

So, is Mishy one of the posters gleefully misrepresenting the LGB Alliance’s words to try to portray the majority of the people they represent (not ‘supporters’ or donators as they are different) are heterosexual? Because that seems rather hypocritical if true. Because Mishy uses ‘queer’ to describe themselves if I read that post upthread correctly. And ‘queer’ now includes heterosexuals and anyone else.

Consistency doesn’t seem to be a thing these days.

And posting this here too as it is relevant to this post:

acpuk.org.uk/the-cass-review-and-its-implications-psychologically-informed-considerations-for-the-future/

Under the section titled 'Psychological and social factors' is this.

"As psychologists, we are aware that many young people who experience same-sex attraction will, at some stage, question their gender identity or experience gender dysphoria. They are also likely to behave in gender-nonconforming ways."

"Homophobia persists to some extent both within health and social care settings, and in wider civil society. We need to better understand the possible relationships between the experience of homophobia and gender identity exploration and/or dysphoria in some young people."

I would love to see the reason clarified again why LGB Alliance should not be involved in ensuring same sex or bisexual young people are receiving the very best level of health care. Just like every single person in this country should.

Even the Association of Clinical Psychologists have put it in their statement.

It does tend to put the post from yetanotherusernameAgain into perspective.