Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Sajid Javid just resigned

612 replies

achillestoes · 05/07/2022 18:11

That’s all.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Provenceinthesummer · 06/07/2022 13:57

achillestoes · 06/07/2022 13:54

@Blossomtoes

By a democratic majority, yes. That’s all Parliament is: a collection of representatives of the electorate. We have the right to remove a government. No individual bureaucrat or group of bureaucrats does.

Except it appears the 1922 committee, and if that happens the system will collapse. We will no longer be a democracy - yes it is that serious.

Or doesn’t matter who you vote for - this is really deeply disturbing.

achillestoes · 06/07/2022 13:57

@Blossomtoes

Regardless, the electorate chooses the government of the day. The MPs of the biggest party choose their own leader. That is democratic and correct. The Tories can remove Johnson but until they do (by whatever rules they can arrive at by consensus) he is PM.

OP posts:
Provenceinthesummer · 06/07/2022 13:58

*It doesn’t

achillestoes · 06/07/2022 13:58

@Provenceinthesummer

It isn’t. They are members of the Tory parliamentary party. He won’t be removed unless he loses a VONC, voted for by elected MPs.

OP posts:
Provenceinthesummer · 06/07/2022 14:01

Indeed the confidence vote has just happened! Boris won. It looks like ‘some’ people think that it is the wrong answer - so they are trying to fix and corrupt the outcome.

You might think this is a good thing if you hate Boris, but the markets feel differently. It is tanking and with good reason. It is worth considering what it will be like living in a technocratic state……

Provenceinthesummer · 06/07/2022 14:03

achillestoes · 06/07/2022 13:58

@Provenceinthesummer

It isn’t. They are members of the Tory parliamentary party. He won’t be removed unless he loses a VONC, voted for by elected MPs.

Op the committee plan to “change the rules” to force another confidence vote.
It is a corrupted move that will start a chain of events that will render the country undemocratic.

achillestoes · 06/07/2022 14:05

@Provenceinthesummer

He still has to lose the VONC to be removed. If he doesn’t command the confidence of a majority of his MPs he should go.

OP posts:
Provenceinthesummer · 06/07/2022 14:05

You have a confidence vote - the outcome is accepted by all for another year.
Unless it’s the wrong answer and then they rig the rule change, meddle with the vote and force a continuation of new confidence votes until they get the ‘right’ answer - hardly democratic!!

Provenceinthesummer · 06/07/2022 14:06

You are missing the point. He won the vote, and shouldn’t need to face another for 12 months

SamphirethePogoingStickerist · 06/07/2022 14:07

Blossomtoes · 06/07/2022 13:55

By a democratic majority, yes

No government has ever had a democratic majority. First past the post doesn’t allow it.

Well, that's what we are working with.

achillestoes · 06/07/2022 14:08

@Provenceinthesummer

I’m not missing it. If they change the rules, they do. He still has a chance to prove his continued legitimacy (although I accept that constant changes to the rules presents a problem).

OP posts:
Blossomtoes · 06/07/2022 14:08

It is a corrupted move that will start a chain of events that will render the country undemocratic

That chain of events began three years ago with the illegal prorogue of parliament. You seem very unconcerned about that for someone who values democracy so highly

achillestoes · 06/07/2022 14:09

Surely nobody here would want Johnson in place as PM without the confidence of the majority of his MPs? On what basis would he be PM?

OTOH, if it turns out he does have it, the dissenters need to stop whining and let him get on.

OP posts:
SamphirethePogoingStickerist · 06/07/2022 14:15

Well, it's a tactic. One that Scotland is getting used to!

Provenceinthesummer · 06/07/2022 14:21

Don’t you see that if every elected leader is subjected to relentless confidence votes - regardless of political colour - we will never ever get anything done, the country becomes a failed undemocratic state - we vote someone into office in good faith, and it’s overthrown by some men in grey suits further down the line.

And of course that’s going to apply to every leader - the rules will be changed. It is such a corrosive concept I am not even sure they will vote for it - the committee.

A PM will no longer have any power - it can be taken at any moment by an unelected man/men in the back office. The rules can be bent and changed at will. Of course we should be worried about that!!

GCRich · 06/07/2022 14:22

Provenceinthesummer · 06/07/2022 14:06

You are missing the point. He won the vote, and shouldn’t need to face another for 12 months

If the future of democracy in the UK is dependent on the internal rules of the tory party then democracy is already fucked in the UK.

GCRich · 06/07/2022 14:23

Provenceinthesummer · 06/07/2022 14:21

Don’t you see that if every elected leader is subjected to relentless confidence votes - regardless of political colour - we will never ever get anything done, the country becomes a failed undemocratic state - we vote someone into office in good faith, and it’s overthrown by some men in grey suits further down the line.

And of course that’s going to apply to every leader - the rules will be changed. It is such a corrosive concept I am not even sure they will vote for it - the committee.

A PM will no longer have any power - it can be taken at any moment by an unelected man/men in the back office. The rules can be bent and changed at will. Of course we should be worried about that!!

Don't you get that we have become a failed state because we have a leader who no-one trusts because he is demonstrably dishonest and corrupt?

achillestoes · 06/07/2022 14:26

@Provenceinthesummer

I understand the concern, but the PM should be able to command the confidence of the majority of his party. He’s just an MP otherwise.

OP posts:
MangyInseam · 06/07/2022 14:27

Eeksteek · 06/07/2022 00:27

Like him being guilty of breaking the law at work during a time of great national distress? Tried that one

How about him having sex at work with someone he wasn’t married to? Nope, that’s out there too.

Lying to the queen - she’s popular just now - surely no one wants to see the old dear disrespected? Oh, no, the public know about that already.

Ooooh, I know abuse of his position - people hate that. If they found out he tried to get his mistress a £100k a year job she was in no way qualified to do…..surely he’d go to keep that quie……..oh, no, we’ve put that behind us.

You can’t blackmail someone who doesn’t care what people think. He doesn’t think people are important, so their opinions have no merit. There are no consequences for his actions. He has money, he has power. He has connections. He has never learnt that there are consequences for crappy actions. If he did a poor job, or broke the law, or shafted his wife, or got an unspecified number of women who weren’t his wife pregnant, he just….walked away. Got another job through the old boys network, paid the fines (with no noticeable effect on his available money), ignored the child. People don’t matter to him. Why would he GAF what we know? We can’t do anything about it. So why would he resign from a position he has coveted his whole life, and expected - feels he has not just deserves, but is a right, just because people he couldn’t give a shit about know he did stuff that he doesn’t think is wrong for him to do anyway? He won’t. He’s basically untouchable because he doesn’t care.

You can pressure people in areas that have nothing to do with their feelings, where they have to make a pragmatic decision to save their own skin.

The question is whether anyone wants to bring that kind of element into it.

If his position will become untenable in other ways I imagine they won't. But I don't think the party will allow him to stay if they think he will lose them an election.

I think there is a good chance he'll be done by the end of the month, if not this week.

Provenceinthesummer · 06/07/2022 14:29

I disagree - we are still a democratic and fair state if the elected leaders are still accountable to the ELECTORATE and not the little men in the grey suits in the committee.
People will have their chance to voice their feelings at the ballot box. That is how democracies function.

Provenceinthesummer · 06/07/2022 14:32

i imagine if pushed he will call a GE

achillestoes · 06/07/2022 14:33

@Provenceinthesummer

It isn’t how this democracy functions. He is accountable to his MPs. Part of me hopes he wins (getting rid of him risks Penny Mordaunt) but he has to win to be legitimate. MPs aren’t ‘men in grey suits’, they’re our representatives.

OP posts:
Provenceinthesummer · 06/07/2022 14:33

After this I imagine the main parties are going to split - Labour is falling apart - it feels like something huge is truly shifting

Provenceinthesummer · 06/07/2022 14:38

achillestoes · 06/07/2022 14:33

@Provenceinthesummer

It isn’t how this democracy functions. He is accountable to his MPs. Part of me hopes he wins (getting rid of him risks Penny Mordaunt) but he has to win to be legitimate. MPs aren’t ‘men in grey suits’, they’re our representatives.

For gods sake how many times!!

The Confidence Vote only happened last week! He won the full confidence of his MPs

It is not the case that we keep going until we get a ‘different answer.’ He won just days ago - the result should be upheld and respected. It might not suit all, but that’s how democracy works.

Cuck00soup · 06/07/2022 14:41

The latest resignations including Kemi Badenoch were co-ordinated. This seems like a sign of gathering pace, doesn't it?

Swipe left for the next trending thread