The whole weird dynamic between the left and the women who cling on to it can be seen in a statement by A Woman’s Place made in response to Kellie-Jay’s tweet: ‘We know failure to recognise the concerns of women, as well as active mistreatment of women on and by the parts of the political left has led to many becoming estranged or ostracised from the socialist and labour movement. Our values remain of the left and progressive, and we still believe that equality, justice and solidarity are worth fighting for.’
I think this quote is interesting and gets to the heart of the disagreement in some ways.
It seems to very accurately describe how some feel. To put it on it's head, they can't leave the left because another political position would not be progressive, and would not be about justice, and would not believe in equality or solidarity.
So the underlying idea is that the left, and the left alone, believe in solidarity, justice, and progressivism, and leaving the left would mean abandoning those things.
I think that maybe what Berchill is getting at is, that assumption needs to be scrutinized. Maybe it's not only the left that believes in justice. Maybe we need to ask what is meant by solidarity and equality, and whether those ideas only exist on the left.
I think there are quite a lot of people who have asked that in relation to organizations like the Labour Party, and have come to the conclusions that the assumption that those values only exist on one side is wrong. And instead that there are people in both parties who value those things, and some who don't, and a greater difference is how they see those values functioning in society.
The idea of political progressivism is perhaps somewhat different, I think that a certain number of people have begun to think that as a concept or ideology it may be fatally flawed, and in fact part of what allowed gender ideology to take hold and flourish. Because in practice it amounts to a kind of utopianism, the idea of a "right side of history" and an assumption that we know what constitutes progress. And so it stymies looking at policy ideas from the perspective of pros and cons and thinking about unexpected effects over time.