I posted about the other case which had already been tried @Lenalen
Can you show me which part of his tweets were more than “being rude” “misgendering” or “insults”.
Because I can’t see anything outside of those categories. Yes, the tone is very rude and unpleasant, but it doesn’t remotely stray into threats or stirring up hatred (which implies encouraging others).
That you find Ellingsen unpleasant is irrelevant. Unless she is using criminal hate speech in its traditional sense, which would have to include threats or stirring other people towards violence. The definition of hate speech, like so many other things, has been changed so that it is now too broad and people can indeed be prosecuted for mere insults, if those insults are made against certain protected groups.
I suspect it means that two men can be slinging insults on Facebook and the first man can have the second man prosecuted because the first man claims he’s a woman. And if I’m right, that’s a very dangerous path to head down.
If Norwegian law is as narrow as you say, can you explain it please, and explain how this man broke it?