Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Northumbria University - Sarah Phillimore and Harry Miller 'seen as a 'safety and wellbeing' risk to an entire university.'

188 replies

ChristinaXYZ · 06/06/2022 15:02

Open letter on Sarah Phillimore's website shows how deep the interference with debate and free speech goes at some universities.

sarahphillimore.substack.com/p/a-letter-to-northumbria-university

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
TastefulRainbowUnicorn · 08/06/2022 04:24

>That she has the intelligence and can appreciate that this tweet has the potential to endorse and encourage people with transphobic views, and she supports the tweet anyway?

I would just like to point out that your posts on this thread also have the potential to “endorse and encourage” people with “transphobic views” (e.g. by being anti-persuasive) and yet you “support” them anyway. Why do you do this? Could it possibly be that your accusations are so ridiculously loose and vague that they could be levelled at anyone who ever engages in any kind of public speech?

suggestionsplease1 · 08/06/2022 08:41

RoseslnTheHospital · 07/06/2022 23:52

"Thanks, but no thanks. Hate is as legitimate an emotion as love or indifference and, like our thinking, our emotions are not a police matter. Of course, say we say No to criminal behaviour. But we #SayYesToHate."

A tweet by WeAreFairCop on 20/11/2020
Which is the one I think you are referring to although please do post the correct one if this is not it.

Tweet

Northumbria University - Sarah Phillimore and Harry Miller 'seen as a 'safety and wellbeing' risk to an entire university.'
suggestionsplease1 · 08/06/2022 08:46

Imagine being the relative or friend of a loved one who has lost their life in a transphobic hate crime, and then feeling a little bit relieved to see a police force honouring and remembering those who have lost their lives or experienced crime against them because of their trans status.... and then seeing that post from Fair Cop encouraging people to 'Say Yes to Hate'

Helleofabore · 08/06/2022 08:49

Please stop with the emotional manipulation. As a debate device it has been over deployed.

TastefulRainbowUnicorn · 08/06/2022 08:49

Imagine being the relative or friend of a loved one who has lost their life in a transphobic hate crime

What a weird thing to get exercised about. There are zero of these people in the UK. Zero.

None of the dozen or so trans people who’ve ever been murdered in the UK were killed in hate crimes.

sweetgrapes · 08/06/2022 08:51

Now imagine being someone who has lost a female loved one (women murdered at the rate of 2 a week) and being so disheartened to see the time that the police force are wasting over ribbons and such like. But had no time to respond when someone is attacking them.. (not all police....)

AlisonDonut · 08/06/2022 09:28

suggestionsplease1 · 08/06/2022 08:46

Imagine being the relative or friend of a loved one who has lost their life in a transphobic hate crime, and then feeling a little bit relieved to see a police force honouring and remembering those who have lost their lives or experienced crime against them because of their trans status.... and then seeing that post from Fair Cop encouraging people to 'Say Yes to Hate'

So we have to ignore the women, and the girls, the lesbians, the gays; and the in your face woman-hating 'trans' police officers who literally stick a gun our way; just so that we can allow the police to virtue signal about how caring they are to a small population of people who are actually the least likely to be murdered in the UK?

There are more trans murderers than there are trans people murdered.

Imagine if there were more female murderers than females murdered.

They would be legistlating [even more than they are now] to remove all our rights. But here, they are flying multicoloured flags celebrating it.

SlightlyGeordieJohn · 08/06/2022 10:09

suggestionsplease1 · 08/06/2022 08:46

Imagine being the relative or friend of a loved one who has lost their life in a transphobic hate crime, and then feeling a little bit relieved to see a police force honouring and remembering those who have lost their lives or experienced crime against them because of their trans status.... and then seeing that post from Fair Cop encouraging people to 'Say Yes to Hate'

Trans identifying males in the UK would appear to be more likely to murder someone than to be murdered.

We see all the time the ugly threats made by trans males on Twitter; this pretence that they are marginalized or threatened just isn’t tenable, and can’t be allowed to pass unchallenged.

Why, out of all the psychological issues that people experience are we being told to pander to this one, and accept such lies?

NancyDrawed · 08/06/2022 11:02

suggestionsplease1 · 07/06/2022 18:19

I think it's pretty short-sighted if you can not envision how hearing particular views can be a starting point to harm.

Let's take a view that is different to mine and probably yours - it is what many people would call a racist viewpoint. It's held by an individual who has done a lot of research and feels that they have found evidence that a certain ethnicity is inherently more likely to be less intelligent and also inherently more criminal. They think they have stats and research that can back this up and that the social factors that others think may be at work are not actually relevant at all. They think they have found 'The Truth'. They think they are entitled to share this information, as it is 'The Truth' after all. They demand platforms to raise awareness of their views and have proposals to mitigate the harm that others may experience from this group's increased inherent criminality. So should universities then give this person a platform to share their viewpoint? What is the harm? It's just another viewpoint, right?

The potential harm is that others believe this rhetoric, develop a corresponding cognitive bias or perception error and come to think of this particular group, and all individuals that are in it, as more likely to be inherently criminal. They act differently around them, they avoid them, they treat them differently, they feel suspicion and hostility because they have been persuaded by this viewpoint. The people who belong to this group also hear this viewpoint and internalise these attributions and begin to think differently of themselves - they are told to think they are inherently more criminal, less intelligent; they experience shame, and low self-esteem.

The two factors together combine to create a powerful sentiment against, and negative outcomes for, this group. The spreading of this viewpoint encourages other to feel prejudiced and hostile towards them, and has fuelled self-loathing for the individual. They lose confidence to participate in society or to seek support. They don't know which environments will accept them or where they will be shunned. They achieve less educationally and in the workplace and their health and wellbeing outcomes are lower and their lifespan is many years less that the average. The stigma, hostility and lack of social support that they face makes them more likely to become involved with the criminal justice system...

...and this is the icing on the cake for that first individual who wanted to promote their viewpoint - because now they feel they have even more evidence for this supposed increased inherent criminality that they were talking about.

But it's just a viewpoint right? How on earth could that be harmful?

I think you're reaching a fair bit there.

If I attended a presentation that turned out to be racist and offensive as per your example, I would either leave, or challenge the presenter on their views. I would not blindly take one person's view and immediately start acting differently to people depending on their skin colour. If the presentation said 'all people with blue eyes are of low intelligence' I'm not going to think 'Oh well, despite evidence to the contrary, actually I must be stupid because that is another person's opinion'. So while I see the point you are trying to make, I think it's a bit of a stretch. Your phrase 'they are told to think that....xyz' is rather telling. To blindly do as you are told, to think what you are told to think without question is to make yourself very vulnerable to other people's will, don't you think?

People get their beliefs challenged all of the time. I don't think Sarah Phillimore was invited to whip up a frenzy of people to go and attack those with different views, do you?

suggestionsplease1 · 08/06/2022 11:06

NancyDrawed · 08/06/2022 11:02

I think you're reaching a fair bit there.

If I attended a presentation that turned out to be racist and offensive as per your example, I would either leave, or challenge the presenter on their views. I would not blindly take one person's view and immediately start acting differently to people depending on their skin colour. If the presentation said 'all people with blue eyes are of low intelligence' I'm not going to think 'Oh well, despite evidence to the contrary, actually I must be stupid because that is another person's opinion'. So while I see the point you are trying to make, I think it's a bit of a stretch. Your phrase 'they are told to think that....xyz' is rather telling. To blindly do as you are told, to think what you are told to think without question is to make yourself very vulnerable to other people's will, don't you think?

People get their beliefs challenged all of the time. I don't think Sarah Phillimore was invited to whip up a frenzy of people to go and attack those with different views, do you?

That's fine for you to say for yourself, but have you no understanding or appreciation of how others may be influenced by expression of views?

SlightlyGeordieJohn · 08/06/2022 11:09

suggestionsplease1 · 08/06/2022 11:06

That's fine for you to say for yourself, but have you no understanding or appreciation of how others may be influenced by expression of views?

You seem to have a very low opinion of the intellect of others, which, given your posts here, is strange.

suggestionsplease1 · 08/06/2022 11:19

Again, there is an amazing amount of non sequiturs in this thread.

GC feminists often seem to to tout their logic and reason, but on this thread can not respond with sound reason or logic to the point of whether that tweet is acceptable.

I don't really want to get off topic like everyone appears to want to do, but of course people are asserting a lot of misleading nonsense about rates of victimhood, so just to address that in passing; in the largest database that has ever been examined for crime against trans people (consisting of interviews with hundred of thousands of people), it was found that trans people are four times more likely to be victims of violent crime than non trans people.

williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/press/ncvs-trans-press-release/

TheBiologyStupid · 08/06/2022 11:30

suggestionsplease1 - You've posted that link based from the US on other threads, where its various deficiencies have been pointed out ad nauseam. The situation in the UK is not comparable.

AlisonDonut · 08/06/2022 11:37

GC feminists often seem to to tout their logic and reason, but on this thread can not respond with sound reason or logic to the point of whether that tweet is acceptable

The hate speech tweet?

Pridewashing by pretending to support inclusivity to get up the Stonewall index, by only focusing on one 'diverse group' [Trans] is hateful towards:
Lesbians [cotton ceiling - the workshop run by a Stonewall employee]
Women [can't even support IWD, everything has to be about transwomen not actual women, Stonewall wanting the word women removed from all documentation and legislation]
Gender non-conforming kids [giving kids Lupron which will hault the development of their genitals and results in sterilisation and often goes on to medical interventions which result in castration]

You cannot not understand this can you?

suggestionsplease1 · 08/06/2022 11:44

TheBiologyStupid · 08/06/2022 11:30

suggestionsplease1 - You've posted that link based from the US on other threads, where its various deficiencies have been pointed out ad nauseam. The situation in the UK is not comparable.

I can't recall anyone giving any credible critique against it actually.

I recall some people saying 'well that's the US and not the UK', as if there's some magical invisible longitude line over the Atlantic somewhere that transforms the experiences of trans people.

Here's some info from the UK, only twice as likely as non trans people to be victims of crime rather than four times! Lucky them eh?

www.theguardian.com/society/2020/jul/17/trans-people-twice-as-likely-to-be-victims-of-in-england-and-wales

NancyDrawed · 08/06/2022 12:00

suggestionsplease1

'That's fine for you to say for yourself, but have you no understanding or appreciation of how others may be influenced by expression of views?'

I would hope that at a university, the students would be able to apply some critical thinking and not just blindly follow a leader. And worry for those that can't think for themselves because they are open to exploitation.

TheBiologyStupid · 08/06/2022 12:06

I can't recall anyone giving any credible critique against it actually.

I recall some people saying 'well that's the US and not the UK', as if there's some magical invisible longitude line over the Atlantic somewhere that transforms the experiences of trans people.

My recollection is that 1) It's a press release 2) Patterns of crime differ greatly between the US and the UK 3) The UK has very different health and social security systems 4) The UK's legal system is very different and gender reassignment is a protected characteristic in the UK 5) As a result of the aforementioned, and other factors, there are very significant differences and experiences between identifying as transgender in the US and UK.

titchy · 08/06/2022 12:06

That's fine for you to say for yourself, but have you no understanding or appreciation of how others may be influenced by expression of views?

Are you seriously suggesting that universities in this country should NOT encourage debate, not encourage critical thinking, that before they enrol potential students should be told exactly what to think, which views they can express? Really? REALLY?

May I suggest you read up on regimes in N Korea, Afghanistan, China seeing as you're so supported of enforced group-think.

RoseslnTheHospital · 08/06/2022 12:07

"I recall some people saying 'well that's the US and not the UK', as if there's some magical invisible longitude line over the Atlantic somewhere that transforms the experiences of trans people."

There are massive cultural, societal, ethnic, geographical, legal, religious, educational, etc etc etc differences between the UK and the US. Of course there will be different experiences for different groups of people between the two countries.

suggestionsplease1 · 08/06/2022 12:11

NancyDrawed · 08/06/2022 12:00

suggestionsplease1

'That's fine for you to say for yourself, but have you no understanding or appreciation of how others may be influenced by expression of views?'

I would hope that at a university, the students would be able to apply some critical thinking and not just blindly follow a leader. And worry for those that can't think for themselves because they are open to exploitation.

Unfortunately history shows that the power of persuasion and rhetoric to malign an outgroup has the potential to influence at every level of education.

334bu · 08/06/2022 12:13

Here's some info from the UK, only twice as likely as non trans people to be victims of crime rather than four times! Lucky them eh?

Do you have any actual crime stats to back that up? Fortunately for males who identify as women, in the UK their chances of being murdered is far less than the general population

titchy · 08/06/2022 12:16

What's a crime though? Inadvertently calling a TW 'he' is usually akin to violence no?

TheBiologyStupid · 08/06/2022 12:26

Indeed, crime statistics involving the transgender population of the UK are blurred by the huge number of self-reported "hate crimes" such as women displaying posters saying "Woman=Adult Human Female" etc. etc. ad infinitum.

IcakethereforeIam · 08/06/2022 12:29

Northumberland Uni. have backed down and apologised:

mobile.twitter.com/SVPhillimore/status/1534481109274312710

Anyway someone was explaining to GCs something about being maligned?

Helleofabore · 08/06/2022 12:30

suggestions

considering a hate crime can be a sticker or a ribbon, posting that statistic is actually nonsense.

Do trans people experience crimes against them? Yes, of course they do. In this political climate and with the very low bar of recordinng ‘crime’, and that misgendering is considered abuse, can you say with confidence that trans people suffer crimes against them as a group more than other groups?

I do not have that confidence at all.

I am glad that you think trans people suffer more hate crime than other groups. Imagine if women were allowed to report ‘hate’ in the same way and be taken as seriously. It may well shut down the police forces in the magnitude.

Swipe left for the next trending thread