There is no increasing pornification of the female body. Porn has been around since the Ancients. They’ve found pornographic pictures, mosaics, graffiti that are over 3,000 years old. And back then, live sex shows were common entertainment. All through the medieval, renaissance, Georgian, Victorian times there was still pornography despite repeated efforts to ban it.
There is no increasing focus on the interior of the female body as a place of work (sex work, surrogacy) either. Sex work has been historically always part of human society and often linked to slavery. Of course, forced surrogacy for profit existed too as masters often would impregnate their female slaves by raping them specifically so they could breed more slaves and then sell them for money. This was done from millenia ago up to just two centuries ago. The trend is actually decreasing not increasing as more women have rights than ever before.
Online porn has truly changed the availability of porn, so you are mistaken about nothing having changed in the history of porn. The consumption of porn has never been as widespread as it is now, and that includes the consumption of misogynistic porn. It's available at home, and it is very difficult to stop pre-teens from accessing it and probably creating their ideas about female sexuality, say, from it when it's not actually written to reflect that.
I also disagree that there has been no increasing focus on the commercialisation of the female body, but I compare this to more recent events than what happened millennia ago.
There's a reframing of sex work, say, as just another type of low-paid female work, without any real focus on that 'female' term, i.e., that almost every single customer in prostitution is male and the majority of the workers are female (but not the 'manager class'). I see this as part of the general erasure of the female sex.