She was also sacked from her job, denied her full final salary and access to unemployment if she refused to sign a non disclosure and then other organisations that she spoke at (paid and non paid positions) cancelled her talks and she was sacked from volunteer positions. So yes... she was sacked from her job and they cited the article as the reason she was sacked. (Apologies if I misunderstood your post)
You didn't misunderstand- my fault for not reading the article (trying to launch children). I knew about her already from the medium debacle but didn't realise she'd already lost her job by that point.
That article is chilling. I am constantly amazed at these women who are willing to keep going in the face of appalling treatment.
And you say that everytime they punish women they add to the weight of opposition... sadly that doesnt even come close to being true. Mostly when they punish women, women do not have the support or resources to defend or fight, mostly when women are punished, they are silenced.
You are sadly correct in the short term- this strategy has paid big dividends already. I'm not trying to minimise the awful way some women hve suffered and, of course, it often works because not every has the resources to do what MK Fain, M Forstater or JK Rowling have done. Still I hope that, in the long run, totalitarianism is self defeating and the bulling tactics serve to harden resolve and bring attention to the issue.