@VestofAbsurdity
Probably the worst in terms of potential scope (though the least specific, so harder to get anyone excited about opposing right now) is governmental interference in the electoral commission:
www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/feb/21/uk-elections-watchdog-warns-bill-threatens-its-independence-electoral-commission
In a strongly worded and highly unusual public letter, the Electoral Commission said provisions in the elections bill for ministers to draw up a new “strategy and policy statement” – which the watchdog must take account of – had no precedent in comparable democracies.
“It is our firm and shared view that the introduction of a strategy and policy statement – enabling the government to guide the work of the commission – is inconsistent with the role that an independent electoral commission plays in a healthy democracy,” the letter said.
“This independence is fundamental to maintaining confidence and legitimacy in our electoral system.”
There are a number of other issues, such as the introduction of having to produce approved photo ID for voting. While the government claims this is to combat impersonation in voting, all the evidence suggests that this is an almost non-existent problem. And the most likely people to be unable to produce the required ID will be the young, itinerant, immigrant etc. etc. - ie. all those groups most likely to vote Labour.
Canvassing and getting the vote out at elections, I've seen first hand how hard it is for some people to simply vote. People with disabilities, or caring for others, people who don't own vehicles or for whatever reason can't get to a polling station. People who's lives are just so hard and frantic they don't have the space to think about and prepare for it. Yes, you can say people should make more effort if they care about how the country is run, but the fact remains it's easier for some people than for others to make that effort. Changes to the system should be designed to make it easier for EVERYONE, not to exacerbate the divide so we can continue to be governed by an unrepresentative wealthy gerontocracy.
The bill also allows expats of over 15 years non-residence here to vote and contribute to party funding, for the first time ever. I wonder who that's supposed to benefit?
www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/sep/07/what-does-the-uk-elections-bill-set-out