@Roseglen84
MangyInseam
You can tell that to people I suppose, that they should keep sexual things at home, but the fact is that often we don't know what is going on in the mind of someone in a public space. What is the difference between some guy wearing a dress because he wants to subvert gender norms, and one who is playing a role for a thrill?
I think most women don't actually care too much about why men do this, nor is it strictly our business why. In the end, the result for women is pretty much the same. Therefore what we do very much care about is that men are using this as an excuse to breach our spaces.
That is why I said -
I would think the line should be drawn when those fantasies are taken into a public space, particularly one that is designated for a particular group they are not part of. That's why we have to have a solid 'no men in women's spaces, end of!' It's the only way.
I didn't think we were talking just about women's spaces though, but public spaces in general where simply interacting in public may be used as an affirmation in someone's fantasy.
Which is a perfectly possible scenario. But so is a gay male cross-dresser who has no interest in that, and some guy wearing a dress might look quite similar as well. Do we react to them all similarly? Does allowing the less problematic instances make it difficult to shut down the problematic ones?
I suppose my thinking with all of this is that our society teaches that while there are valid and important physical boundaries around sexual behaviour, mental boundaries around it, what we all do in our own minds, are not important and may even be unhealthy.
But this seems to assume that the mental landscape isn't strongly linked to manifestation, which I think is incorrect.
Someone upthread mentioned that these boys that develop AGP could be anyone, our sons, brothers, nephews, students, just otherwise normal little boys. And by allowing these kids, who are not yet of an age to be sexually active, to believe that whatever sexual thoughts they have, it is harmless and nothing to worry about - we are putting them in a position where they will totally unwittingly indulge and reinforce the attraction and arousal derived from that kind of thinking. By they time they are twenty they could have eight years of that reinforcement behind them. And no tools to try and repress what may have become a very significant obsession.