Comments are - all but maybe one - critical of the article
Here are some:
“ No. Just no. You are such a small, but noisy, minority but you live in a bubble and think this is a reasonable argument.
The vast majority do not.
XX and XY . End of debate”
“ Well I haven’t made it past the first few paragraphs without seeing such a massive flaw.
This isn’t about empathy. It’s about biology and facts.
DNA plays a vital role. So to suggest it has reduced the argument is ridiculous.
Developing as a male and then suppressing a little bit of testosterone is not “finding womanhood a different way”. It is literally getting all the male development advantages and taking that into a female sports competition.
I see you’ve done the typical TRA thing of victimhood over reality. The arguments that get me down usually come from your side. How lesbians are disgusting for not wanting to sleep with trans women with male genitalia for a start.
But we get to sport. Where a male bodied athlete with a slight reduction in testosterone can go from 454th rank in the male category to absolutely smashing the womens category. Yes. Male athletes are taking womens places. Look at Laurie Hubbard. Not stunning and brave. Quite literally a male advantaged body beating a female.
Which really is the crux of this. Sport is segregated by sex. Not gender identity.
You really have fallen for the propaganda”
“ What an appalling article. It is simply weong for biological males to compete in the female protected sports category.
What is difficult about accepting females are biological and not simply how some blokes feel they are in their imagination.
Rather than have trans-activists write on this issue, why not engage qualified sports scientists e.g. Ross Tucker or developmental biologists e.g. Emma Hilton.
Biological males competing in woman's sport is in my view cheating.”