it's about living in a 'woman's body' which Juno, by their own admission, isn't.
I don’t read it like that at all. If Juno didn’t think Juno was actually living in a woman’s body then Juno would have refused to partake in the column, but Juno didn’t.
I mean the whole article is bullshit, so editorially dissonant with the ones that go before it. Take this bit:
None of us are beholden to our bodies. That is not to say that our bodies aren’t vital; they are. Being a woman – cisgender or trans – can feel like you are being set up to fail from the start, and our bodies often affect how well we are able to function within society. But I believe in individual bodily autonomy; a refusal to let the system predetermine or limit your choices is one of the ways we attack patriarchal structures.
This is so utterly insulting to Nazia, the woman from Afghanistan, for example. If only she would refuse to let the system of patriarchal structures limit her choices, then she’d be fiiine
.
Maybe Juno and Nazia could trade lives for a few months, and Juno could demonstrate in the real world how to attack the patriarchal structures though Juno’s refusal to let the system predetermine Juno’s choices
.