Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

To not understand the issue with surrogacy?

987 replies

Blackbird1234 · 30/12/2021 18:29

I've seen a few posts on some threads in this topic, from people condemning surrogacy. I don't understand why it is seen as bad, if all parties consent. Can anyone explain, please?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
purplehairlady · 31/12/2021 09:18

@Blackbird1234

So how about if it was a rich couple using another rich woman as a surrogate - would that be viewed in a better way?

Unethical or not, surely with something like this as long as there is full consent from all parties it should be fine?

Both genuine questions, not snippy replies.

Yes. But the fact it never happens when they're two unrelated parties should tell you all you need to know...
Starcup · 31/12/2021 09:21

@OhHolyJesus

But you’re removing every responsibility from the woman and placing in the hand of the public, who aren’t involved at all.

You know women are half of 'the public' right? That would include mothers, surrogate mothers, adopting mothers, single women, lesbians, sisters....

Surrogate mothers, commissioning parents and surrogacy agencies and charities all responded to the initial call for the public consultation. The government asked the law commission to conduct a public consultation prior to reforming the law. It is common practice. Conversion therapy is a recent one you might want to look at, it is still open.

Please do let me know what you think of the other examples I listed. I'm interested to know what you think of the paedophile especially and the paralysed woman especially.

I could see you were pretty ‘famous’ on your last thread as well with your opinions.

I seenu put comment about the examples you’ve just given but that happens up and down the country sadly and not specific to surrogacy…

mrkramps · 31/12/2021 09:22

@Devilmakes3

So how about if it was a rich couple using another rich woman as a surrogate - would that be viewed in a better way

Thin end of the wedge right there.

What is actually happening is that poorer women with fewer economic opportunities in Eastern Europe (Ukraine for example) and Asia (India for example) are being paid to participate in a risky proposition, pregnancy is inherently risky in terms of both morbidity and mortality especially in poorer countries to make available babies for rich western people. It is exploitation. Among many other issues for the children which we have already experienced in countries where forced adoptions took place widely in the past.

These international surrogacy things should totally be illegal. There's only one reason couples look overseas and thats to save money.

It's going to come at a cost, obviously. More like coercion than consent in cases like this

mrkramps · 31/12/2021 09:25

@GoGoGretaDoll

I think OP that when a lot of people hear 'surrogacy' they think about the current British model - the kind of thing you read about in the paper where a sister has had a baby for her sister. This is heavily regulated in the UK and, by law, hardly any money changes hands and the baby is part of a wider family and still in contact with their surrogate. I don't think many people have an issue with this, it's not something that would upset me as a person or a feminist.

But the kind of surrogacy that is becoming more and more prevalent is where rich people from the UK pay for surrogacy from abroad, where it is much, much more of a commercial enterprise. There is a huge power imbalance, and essentially it's baby farming. There was a terrible story in lockdown about a nursery full of babies just being left alone in their cots because their 'parents' couldn't get into the country because of lockdown. There was also another extremely disturbing story about an Australian 'parent' refusing to take a surrogate baby because the baby had been born with a disability. That's just two stories from an issue that's becoming increasingly commodified.

Same. It's type 2 (international) that is really problematic.

In the U.K., rich women aren't hiring poor women. When I first heard this argument i was confused because celebs are going to be scavenging council sites. But I realised it's couples going abroad and exploiting women in poor countries, using agencies.

ChattyLion · 31/12/2021 09:26

Can everyone relying on ‘everything is always OK so long as there is consent’ please look at the horrific stories of long term harm for women and babies and emerging from the Parliamentary inquiry on women being historically pressured or forced to give up their babies for anonymous adoption.

committees.parliament.uk/committee/93/human-rights-joint-committee/news/159804/jchr-examines-historic-treatment-of-unmarried-mothers-in-adoption-inquiry/

Helleofabore · 31/12/2021 09:38

OhHolyJesus

I am outta wine as well as fish. Since you are famous and all, apparently, love it if you could do your magic trick.

Although, I have been advised that some saint has withdrawn fish from sale because we are naughty wims in this corner, and we should know better on strategic use of fish.

mrkramps · 31/12/2021 09:38

Just blame the barrens for surrogacy. Fucking lazy.

Bit PurpleDausies, nobody's blaming them but most women who can safely carry a baby to term aren't hiring surrogates. I'm sides we've all seen news stories, portrayed as heartwarming, where an infertile couple uses a surrogate mother

A Herero couple with sperm issues will get fonor sperm or eggs but if there's an issue with miscarriage etc. They may do surrogacy after

It's not a personal attack unless you have hired a surrogate mother yourself

BernardBlackMissesLangCleg · 31/12/2021 09:40

In the U.K., rich women aren't hiring poor women

oh yeah?

This is the story of a couple exploiting a young woman in the UK
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3157706/I-ll-never-Burger-King-baby-gay-fathers-Surrogate-mother-reveals-heartbreaking-story-lifts-lid-Britain-s-chaotic-cruel-baby-trade.html

  • she was hassled into signing an agreement she hadn't read, without legal advice
  • she was given drugs to administer to herself (by injecting herself in the stomach) without being advised of the serious risks
  • the couple didn't buy her the life insurance they had promised

the whole thing is an exploitative mess, and it happened in the UK

FannyCann · 31/12/2021 09:45

@NynaeveSedai Ah, didnt think of that! Are there any stats on the percentage of surrogate "buyers" being gay men?

@PurpleDaisies Probably a naive/stereotypical view, but I would've thought that it would be women who would try absolutely every single avenue to acquire a child rather than men. When I think of a baby, I think of a woman, not a man and that a man would find it easier to live without one, rather than consider surrogacy.

@Blackbird1234

Here are some statistics from the Law Commission Surrogacy Consultation paper which is now a couple of years out of date. A lot of wealthy gay men go abroad, typically to the USA so they won't be counted in the stats. The numbers of gay men seeking surrogacy arrangements is definitely on the rise and there are several who are very active, starting their own agency, having "trade fairs" around the world and pushing for law reform to widen their access to babies through surrogacy. Infertile women have been used as a Trojan horse because the new buzz phrase is "reproductive equality" meaning gay men should have equal access to surrogacy and the service that support it. I see it as men demanding rights to be provided with babies by a breeder class of woman.

To not understand the issue with surrogacy?
To not understand the issue with surrogacy?
Blackbird1234 · 31/12/2021 09:49

@FannyCann Thanks so so much for all the links, you're absolutely amazing! I 100% do want to learn more about all of this, so they will be very valuable.

After having slept on it and read all of the posts on here, my opinion on surrogacy is forming more and more so thank you all so much for your posts. I've got a bit more learning to do yet, though.

OP posts:
TheMissingMango · 31/12/2021 09:51

I just can't get my head around there being women who have this burning desire to sell/give away a baby.

FannyCann · 31/12/2021 09:52

This gay man who has been actively promoting surrogacy for single me. in the news, on TV couldn't make it clearer that he regards women as walking wombs who should provide babies to order. He said on TV "Because I am gay I don't have access to a womb". He also bemoaned the stress of going to surrogacy meet ups in the hope of connecting with a womb woman who was prepared to have a baby for him, complaining that "surrogates have all the power - they get to choose". How awful, right? Those mean women hoarding their reproductive rights and choosing who to have a baby for. Hmm

To not understand the issue with surrogacy?
Artesia · 31/12/2021 09:53

Because society shouldn't prioritise the wants of prospective parents over the needs of a child.

FannyCann · 31/12/2021 09:55

*single men that should read! Though single me works!

OhHolyJesus · 31/12/2021 09:55

Just because someone can freely choose to do something doesn’t mean as a society we can just let them do it. There’s a responsibility to protect and safeguard the worst case scenarios.

Exactly. Some people 'freely' commit suicide, should we let them get on with it, who are we to say they shouldn't die? Some people want an assisted death, should we let them make their own arrangements and not regulate that to ensure there are checks in place?

RedToothBrush · 31/12/2021 09:55

It’s their choice. No one holds a gun to their head.

The way some people go on on these sites it’s as if a woman is a pathetic being, who is constantly being controlled and can’t make up her own mind.

It’s boring as sin, hearing the same arguments over and over but but but….

I'm sorry you think ethics and morality and the rights of women and children are 'boring'. I think that says a lot about you.

Its a shame that you've never really stopped to consider why so many women, talking amongst themselves, have strong views about how women feel powerless and end up in situations where they make appalling 'choices'.

Its funny that for it to be considered a free choice you use the bar of them 'not having a gun to their head'.

At no point does it occur to you that women around the world do it out of desparation and precisely because they lack choices. Offering money to desparate women who are in poverty to do something that might kill them, disable them, mean they are ostracised from society, or because they are threatened by organised gangs is called what again? The word is 'exploited'.

Making a choice requires it to be made freely and not under extreme duress. Poverty and criminal financial gain are massive features here. Anyone who just ignores this as 'boring' really is quite something. We are talking about the human trafficking of babies here.

And then theres 'altruistic' surrogacy. Something that involves people doing it for a friend or family member. How can it be free consent if there is a couple you know in deep distress? This makes women feel emotionally responsible. Thats the very definition of feeling 'under duress' because if you don't do something someone else will be emotionally up shit creek. And it still involves giving up a baby at the end of it which after going through the physical side and mental side of pregnancy and childbirth isnt without consequences even is all goes well. The obligation. The trauma. Which many will surpress, hide or otherwise never speak of but still exists.

Then there's the women with addiction to being pregnant or who feel they need to do this to have purpose in their life and feel like they have done something worthwhile. Noting here that surrogates in this situation generally already have children. You have to question why they feel so worthless and why they are prepared to risk the security of their children - given they might die or have long term health problems resulting from the pregnancy which are no small consideration.

It raises questions about their self worth at the very least. How do you define 'vulnerable' again?

You don't have to have a gun to be coercised. Its very clear you've given no thought or consideration to coercion and how women all too often lack power or are vulnerable in ways that you aren't.

Thats great for you. It says you have a happy, secure life. It says that you feel able to say no. That you have amazing opportunities and choices.

Newsflash: millions of women just don't. They are far more likely than men to live in poverty. They are far more likely to be victims of domestic abuse. They are far more likely to be vulnerable and open to coercision. No guns needed. Good old fashioned emotional blackmail suffices often enough.

And thats without talking about the emotional issues that adopted kids and ivf donor kids have regarding identity and belonging which are hmmm 'pretty well documented'. Babies who have no rights or ability to seek out where they came from in many cases...

But yes its boring to be going through the same arguments constantly with people who are willfully and deliberately blind to the exploitation of women and commodification of babies. Because they lack any degree of understanding, compassion or empathy.

Hey why don't we just legalise modern slavery whilst we are at it. They signed up for it when they decided to enter the country illegally. They knew what they were doing when they got into prostitution. Lets just forget the whole inconvenience and boredom of talking about ethics. Or talking about what constitutes proper consent. I mean that's just life isn't it? And its sad and all that, but people have to survive and its 'doing good' to allow exploitation. I mean that way we never have a problem so we definitely don't have to address it.

This is extreme right wing economic thinking by the way.

The happy ever after family? Do i think it really exists? Well I think it satisfys the desires of those purchasing and procuring babies. Do i think the surrogates themselves do well out of it? No. Not even for so called altruistic surrogacies. I think the lack of voices says a lot. I think the amount of NDA agreements says a lot. I think the close family ties means there's many emotionally hostage and can't state their true feelings in the most honest of ways and they perhaps bottle it up or surpress it in other ways. Whats telling is when surrogate mothers do speak their stories are disturbing in so many ways even if they are supportive of the concept. The language of someone under control seeps through still.

And yes the kids who have not reached an age whether they start to explore this and feel able to challenge the decisions their commissioning parents made. And they too are somewhat held hostage by the very concept that they were 'manufactured to order' and would not exist if they hadn't been commissioned. Are we going to end up with kids who are riddled with over whelming guilt that they are the result of human exploitation?

Yes so sorry your bored by the debate.

Your boredom over the plight of women just reinforces the need to repeat over and over again indefinitely boring you.

Your entire comment above just says 'i want to silence this debate and I do not wish to be told repeated about the nature of human exploitation and coercion'.

The correct response to that attitude is to speak up against it even louder.

Good day to the tone deaf human traffickers and their supporters. We won't be silenced. We wont let you forget the inconvenient truths that surrogate advocates are so keen to white wash (yes a highly appropriate phrase).

The modern day trade in humans looks different to what it did in the past but its still very much alive and kicking.

RedToothBrush · 31/12/2021 09:58

Who has the money and power to run good pr on surrogacy?

It sure as shit isn't the surrogate women.

TheMissingMango · 31/12/2021 10:01

I keep thinking of the horror of desperate Afghani parents selling their young daughters to raise money to feed the rest of the family.

I would hope that at least the buyers in surrogacy are usually loving homes. Those poor Afghani girls don't have that. But in both situations, humans are being sold.

OhHolyJesus · 31/12/2021 10:01

I could see you were pretty ‘famous’ on your last thread as well with your opinions.

Oh my reputation proceeds me does it? I wonder if that could be in any way related to my research in surrogacy since I came to the subject here in 2019. Just two short years later and I'm Mumsnet famous! Wow. I'd like to thank my fans, MNHQ, all those who supported me. But you too can be an informed individual. You just have to read links outside of your usual sources (mainstream media) and imagine that all is not what it seems...Grin

I seenu put comment about the examples you’ve just given but that happens up and down the country sadly and not specific to surrogacy…

All the links I've shared here (and in other multiple surrogacy related threads - you can check my posting history) are about surrogacy. If you don't read them, that's on you. They are actually 100% specific to surrogacy. This just shows me you haven't and, I suspect won't, read them. Again, no one is forcing you to engage, by gunpoint, nor by financial incentive, or otherwise.

FannyCann · 31/12/2021 10:03

@Blackbird1234 It's a pleasure. I'm always delighted to share.

I do think the media message of it being a lovely thing to do, the gift of love etc etc is very powerful but when people dig into the subject and learn more they often change their minds. I have had several people on twitter acknowledge this.

Jennifer Lahl recently posted this on twitter.

twitter.com/jenniferlahl/status/1470146774639603713?s=21

To not understand the issue with surrogacy?
OhHolyJesus · 31/12/2021 10:08

@TheMissingMango

I just can't get my head around there being women who have this burning desire to sell/give away a baby.
@TheMissingMango

I think the underlining motivating reasons are really interesting and something I always want to hear about. I want to understand it, their reasons are theirs and I don't dismiss them, even when I don't agree with them.

I'm genuinely interesting in 'altruistic' surrogacy, that's why I asked a high earning surrogate mother more questions about her post.

I shared this earlier, the blog reviewed a BBC programme and explored possible reasons for these women to engage in surrogacy. One single mother did it after being suicidal, another appeared to do it to secure a lifelong friendship with connections that could never be severed, having lost her friends when she became pregnant herself. Her story in particular struck me as she seemed to become powerful through giving someone a baby, like she exerted some kind of control. It was weird.

I watched the series myself (in iPlayer) and found the blog pretty accurate.

stopsurrogacynowuk.org/2021/11/26/surrogacy-in-the-extreme/

OhHolyJesus · 31/12/2021 10:11

Great post Red. 👏🏻

Sofawithoutstuffing · 31/12/2021 10:12

@OhHolyJesus

I could see you were pretty ‘famous’ on your last thread as well with your opinions.

Oh my reputation proceeds me does it? I wonder if that could be in any way related to my research in surrogacy since I came to the subject here in 2019. Just two short years later and I'm Mumsnet famous! Wow. I'd like to thank my fans, MNHQ, all those who supported me. But you too can be an informed individual. You just have to read links outside of your usual sources (mainstream media) and imagine that all is not what it seems...Grin

I seenu put comment about the examples you’ve just given but that happens up and down the country sadly and not specific to surrogacy…

All the links I've shared here (and in other multiple surrogacy related threads - you can check my posting history) are about surrogacy. If you don't read them, that's on you. They are actually 100% specific to surrogacy. This just shows me you haven't and, I suspect won't, read them. Again, no one is forcing you to engage, by gunpoint, nor by financial incentive, or otherwise.

What exciting news for you, congratulations on your new found fame. Grin
Helleofabore · 31/12/2021 10:14

how women feel powerless and end up in situations where they make appalling 'choices'.

Well, according to some posters, those situations never happen, and if they did, the women involved agreed to it. And one random poster posting a wonderful account where they are all rosy (what about those children’s mental health when they process what has been done to them) is worth ignoring the posts from children of circumstances where they too were removed as infants from their mothers, parents of adoptive children removed from their mothers, and the many accounts of negative stories published in media (ie those being verified to some degree).

Another bizarre day on MN FWR where women are again being shamed for discussing the potential for other women and for children to be exploited, and where issues around the many facets of coercion and consent are being explored. I have not labeled myself a feminist, but I cannot imagine any feminist being convinced to STFU by someone telling them that ‘that person over there consented and has not been exploited at all so you should stop fighting for those other women and children as a class.’

I am constantly surprised though. Really, I am!

OhHolyJesus · 31/12/2021 10:17

@Helleofabore

OhHolyJesus

I am outta wine as well as fish. Since you are famous and all, apparently, love it if you could do your magic trick.

Although, I have been advised that some saint has withdrawn fish from sale because we are naughty wims in this corner, and we should know better on strategic use of fish.

WineWineWineWineWineWineWineWineWineWineWineWineWineWine🐟🐟🐟🐟🐟🐟🐟🐟🐟🐟🐟🐟🐠🐡