I agree; it was obvious that those following this political agenda never find the evidence or voice of female people, or their needs, compelling.
It's exactly why I feel this report proves that the female brief - which can no longer be the women's brief, because the female need is the one that matters - and the TQ brief must be held separately instead of force teamed in this way. They need entirely separate representation, and the female brief needs people focus on female needs instead of how to best suppress and avoid female needs in order to enable a male centric political agenda. It's now the only way forward; it's clear that the TQ brief is incapable of reciprocation. The existence of female need is in itself seen as hostile and a threat. Which ends any hope of managing mixed sex 'women' as a possible thing.
The evidence has largely been recorded, videoed and scripted, which makes it easy for female people to evidence the obvious bias involved from the beginning. And the degree of political capture and bias involved.
I think at this point, having done the GRA report with a high focus on TQ best interests, what is obviously now required is a female equalities and conflicts inquiry, which looks at female best interests. And will need to be led and staffed by those who do not regard female services, resources and needs as something to be politically stuffed under the rug to better enable their political will. The report is a mess, but it's really quite useful evidence for females by being so.