There is a move on the part of Stonewall, heard numerous times lately, to push the idea that the connecting factor of LGBT+ is solely a political position and belief.
Which is obviously nonsense. Lesbians for example are a diverse group of all colours, creeds, abilities, faiths, races, and the one and only thing that they all have in common is that they are all exclusively same sex attracted. That is what lesbian means. There is no other factor that unites that group.
Once LGBT+ is reduced to 'believers and supporters of x political position', some lesbians are in that group, some are out of it, Stonewall goes on happily repeating that it supports and represents all LGBT+ people (but has actually cast out all the politically non compliant ones) and yet is telling govt etc that they represent all LGBT+ people and look, none of the people in their ranks disagree on their politics!
It's using the current lingering faith and trust in 'supporting LGBT+ is a great thing' and that words still mean what most people think they mean, while quietly achieving political aims, some of which are in actual fact openly homophobic, and which lead to confusions such as the bill on conversion therapy.
So if the meaning of LGB has been gently shifted (and T+ since again, we have seen that LGBT+ excludes those of other political beliefs, meaning 'of the same politics' rather than 'united by the T characteristic', it's reasonable to consider and unpack what other meanings are tucked beneath current vocabulary.
There are after all, beneath the Stonewall umbrella, many diverse groups forming TQ, all of whom would relate differently to the terms of sexuality. A male cross dresser who identifies as a man is not for example expressing the T sense in the same way as a teenaged girl with severe dysphoria.