It doesn't sound that supportive to me.
He writes: "Radical feminist academic versus ‘queer’ fanatics – okay, they probably deserve each other" and then proceeds to largely focus on rapid onset gender dysphoria in teenage girls.
The comments are a bit less charitable:
"The "trans' cause came out of the feminist movement itself which nurtured the very idea that "gender" is fluid and sex unimportant. The "queer" movements they supported as allies have come back to bite them as it turns out they follow through on "deconstruction" of female just as feminists do Male.
As Melanie Phillip's pointed out way back in the '90s in Sex Change Britain feminism is essentially an ideology of adolescent teenage girls who never grow up, and we have handed over great swathes of public policy to their capriciousness where feelings are sovereign and facts and science are patriarchal or even toxic masculinity.
Professor Stock and her ilk spawned this lunacy, perhaps they might now bestir themselves to combat it."
"these exhibitionist weirdos have been enabled by 50 years of feminist gender grievance studies. Radfemz say men and women are essentially the same thing, it's all gender. Sex differences, for them, are not a basis for differentiation.
Most normal men might agree with you, but there's b' all we can do. Mens voices on these matters have been silenced. No male politician dares go against the flow."
"Miss Stock's feminism asserts that women are like men in all but a few immaterial anatomical differences. Along comes a bloke in drag transwoman asserting he's a woman in all but a
few immaterial anatomical differences, and Miss Stock and the sisterhood are all "how very dare you". Qui Verbum Dei contempserunt, eis auferetur etiam verbum hominis."
"You reap what you sow. This harridan has been happy to undermine men, cause division and resentment between the sexes. Has, no doubt, trumpeted the 'rights' of women to murder babies in the womb, to neglect their children in favour of careers and to reject secure family relationships.
The feminists would be perfectly happy for the trans movement to continue uncontested if they hadn't suddenly realised that it would have an impact on female spaces and sports. I note most of their grumbling is about male to female transitioning not female to male. The radical feminist movement are just p'ed off that 'wimmins issues' are now less important in the hierarchy of minority victimhood than trans rights."