I've sat here reading some of the links and my brain is on fire with it all. I'm sure that in proper legalise this isn't what's known as vexatious litigation - n.b. I was trying hard to think of the word vexatious for about half an hour because I knew the phrase but kept coming up with fictitious, vicious, the brain on fire did not help - which means a legal action which is taken for the sole means to harass or subdue an adversary but that's certainly what it looks like to me.
I've had a lot of respect for the Good Law Project but this is ridiculous and has made me lose all respect for them. For one it's really shitty to sue the NHS unless there is some really, really strong reason for it, a death caused by incompetence, for example, and secondly surely any sane person can see that while in an ideal world we'd all be able to get whatever surgery/treatment we needed whenever we needed it, this isn't an ideal world. The NHS is very much up against the wall at the moment, due in no small part to restrictions of funds and what they can and can't do put upon them by successive governments and to go after them for this when we know that waiting lists are getting longer and longer in every part of the service is just so utterly wrong.
The Good Law Project is going very much in the wrong direction by taking on this case.