And the Stephen Port case. www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-48887754
On a practical note, regardless of whether Cressida Dick is removed, how would anyone rid the Met of bad officers?
It's early but bear with me - if they were thorough in their investigations of officers, and removed all of the "bad apples", how many are we talking? 10%? 20%? More?
And given that these officers are likely to be at all levels, how does the force continue to operate in the meantime? How quickly can those officers be replaced?
If it was a factory, where a substantial percentage of the employees were criminal, you could shutter the factory and move production elsewhere. But a police force?
I think the reason this happens, in the Met and elsewhere (because I don't believe any other force is any better) is because it's just too hard to deal with, and gets filed with all the other things that are too hard to do, ie binned.
Look at countries struggling with corruption in police forces, and how little progress they make, despite setting up task forces of supposedly uncorrupted and incorruptible staff.
It's rotten, but at what point is a force past saving? What's the tipping point?
Do we get rid of the worst 10% and rebuild? The worst 30%?
I really think they need to improve as an employer because that's key to attracting more varied staff, more women, more minorities, more parents, more older people with life experience, experience in industry, etc.
I know someone who was on track for direct-entry Inspector and he's given it up because he can do much better elsewhere, and has. I also know female officers who have been treated very badly.
It's probably a hard sell at the moment, improving conditions for police officers at a time when the police are not trusted, but without doing so there's always going to be a sizeable contingent who join for all the wrong reasons and delight in their macho martyrdom. And that's almost impossible to prevent, but if enough people were attracted to the job eventually the influence of those types of officer would be diluted.
And do we really want the person coming to our aid to have worked sixteen hours, or just had their leave cancelled, or just been on standing watch and unable to pee for hours? Who hasn't eaten for hours, who has PPE that doesn't fit, who had been assaulted numerous times?
Is any of that going to result in a reasonable, sympathetic human being, or just another broken-in cop who divides the world into "job" and "civvy"?