@NiceGerbil
One item-
archive.is/Ns0Pj.
Note that I was on threads when BK started gaining attention and I can confirm that most pieces have vanished from the search engines.
Thanks for this, I wonder what the High Court order was about. Usually it is about minors, or keeping the names of victims out of the public. But they is nothing like that.
This is so true:
It is our contention, and belief, that Tusla’s desire to hide the Barbie Kardashian story from public view has little to nothing to do with child protection, which is their remit. Barbie Kardashian, after all, is an adult – and was an adult at all times when her story was covered by Gript.
In their letter to us, they provided no rationale to support their assertion that there is a public interest in keeping the story secret.
No. This appears – to our eyes – to be much more about an arm of the state, faced with defending an action that most citizens would find disturbing and absurd – placing a biological male who wants to rape women in a prison with women – deciding to abuse the legal process to hide the facts of an embarrassing story from the public.
I'm so angry at the government and its various agencies for all perpetuating this crap.