Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Just when there is support for JRK...another actor...sigh...

78 replies

Pudmyboy · 25/07/2021 19:36

From my Yahoo feed; honestly what is it with these people?
The Independent
Fantastic Beasts star Katherine Waterston says trans rights message felt ‘important to communicate’ after JK Rowling controversy
Louis Chilton
Sat, 24 July 2021, 9:27 am
Katherine Waterston, one of the leads of the Fantastic Beasts franchise, has addressed her decision to speak out in support of trans rights.
The actor, who plays the witch Tina Goldstein in the Harry Potter spin-off series, shared a post on Instagram the day after JK Rowling returned a prestigious human rights award.
Rowling gave back the Robert F Kennedy Human Rights Ripple of Hope Award last August, after the foundation’s president denounced the author’s anti-trans comments. Rowling had published a blog listing “five reasons for being worried about the new trans activism”.
Waterston then shared a Guardian article to her Instagram story with the headline: “Trans women pose no threat to cis women, but we pose a threat to them if we make them outcasts.”
Various parts were circled and underlined in red, including the sentence: “Sorry, you can’t be a feminist if you’re not for everyone’s human rights, notably other women’s human rights.”
Speaking to The Independent in a new interview, Waterston reflected on the post, saying: “Because I was associated with Fantastic Beasts, it felt important to communicate my position.
“One wondered if they might be grouped in with other people’s views by association.”
Waterston’s latest film, The World to Come, is in UK cinemas now.

OP posts:
HelenJoyce · 26/07/2021 22:21

Ridiculously, Katherine’s film that she’s trying to promote is about forbidden love between two women in colonial America.

Why was the love forbidden Katherine? Why was it taboo? Was it because of the gender identity of the two people and how they felt inside? Or was it, you know, because it was a lesbian relationship between two women? Defined as such by their biological sex?

Cognitive dissonance for days.

NewlyGranny · 26/07/2021 22:45

How interesting that it's only women actors being ambushed by this line of questioning, though. When you'd think it would be equally important to men.

Wonder why that would be... 🤔

Pudmyboy · 28/07/2021 15:32

I may have more time for these actors if they then declined further involvement in the franchise....but no indication so far....and Weasely has even said he would be up for another go....wonder why?!

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page