'So you endorse "GC" women banning normal women from their space?'
This is fascinating.
So many ideas involved that I don't know if the poster even realised they were stating.
'Gender critical' when used in this way means
Knowing the difference between male and female humans and understanding what those things mean for the different sexes. From sex organs and reproductive function to average differences in strength and size to propensity to violence, sex offending, and onto the sex roles applied sand enforced all over the world, sometimes/ often with massive detriment.
That it is something 99.99999% of the world knows and understands.
99.99999% of the world's population is gender critical. AKA knows that humans come in two sexes and what that means.
Ok.
So next.
Normal women. Normal women are those who don't think that male and female sexes exist etc what I just said.
So.
99.99999% of the world's female people are not 'normal women'.
Normal women are those who think sex is irrelevant in the world.
My 99.9999% is a guess obviously. Think about the world. The mainstream religions. The patriarchal regimes. The wars. The rape. The death in childbirth. The child marriages. Abortion laws. 'Honour' crime. Laws restricting how women dress. Laws that mean prison or potentially execution for homosexuality. And on and on.
I think it's going to be 99.99999%ish. Of not just women but everyone.
OK.
So women who understand that sex makes a massive difference. Are not normal.
Those who think it's irrelevant. Are normal.
Got that thanks.
Next up.
Normal women (those who don't think that sex is relevant and therefore presumably don't think the massive and varied oppression of adult and juvenile female humans around the world is anything to do with them being female) are right to shut down any groups or conversations etc that they are able to. Because those vagina people all over the world, that's 4 billion give or take. Are not normal. The 99.99999% of those vagina people who know that sex matters and is a massive thing in their lives usually to huge detriment.
Ok got that.
And then. There are trans groups to fight for trans things. I haven't seen anyone saying that is not ok. Well not among women anyway. Women understand that trans people and homosexual people and bi people and also homeless people and black people and people who don't have English as a first language and yes even men and boys around issues that affect them, can and should have places to discuss their issues, and organise to work for change if needed. It's good. I'm all for it.
I've never heard a woman get angry about movember, groups for widowed men, testticular Cancer surgery support groups, gay gyms, those raising suicide rates or knife crime.
It's really good that men are getting together around the issues that matter to them. Due to their sex and the position in society that comes from that.
Do you think those things are bad too?
If not. Why not? Interested to hear.
Trans issues are not the same as women's issues.
You say that trans issues should be the focus in women's groups and also in trans groups. And that's the right thing as any women who want to talk about things to do with our biology etc are not 'normal'.
I hear what you're saying.
But it seems. Well. Is that what you really think? That pretty much all of the 4 billion vagina juveniles and adults are not 'normal' and have no reason to want or need or even think of having groups to talk about their wide ranging oppression etc?