That's the one, Arabella - I did look earlier and didn't see it so I'm pleased it's been uploaded so quickly. I was relying on captions - but I think somebody described something akin to the spaces described here:
But these male-free rural idylls risk dying out with their founders, unable to attract a new generation of women who do not feel the same need to escape discrimination, and who believe transgender women and some other minorities should be included.
www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-lgbt-women-idUSKBN1WU18C
There are several excellent presentations within that. As ever, there were useful resources within the Chat function and I'd expect those to turn up on the site.
www.womensdeclaration.com/en/whrc-live/feminist-question-time-links/
tbh, as ever, it seems like we need Badley and the FWR portal so that we can move in and out of that woman-only community at will.
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3435161-Badley-Fuckitt-Welcomes-Careful-Drivers
In the chat, there were understandable/usual comments from people who wanted to know if women could live in these women-only spaces with their male partners and relatives. (The Reuters piece gives an overview of the arguments.)
I did see something recently that some of Biden's changes in the US means that women can no longer have single-sex housing support:
The action represented a stark change in policy at the housing department, which said under the Trump administration last year that the rule would allow shelters to base admissions on “biological sex,” adding that the rule change would accommodate the “religious beliefs of shelter providers.”
…
The proposed rule change was criticized by civil rights groups… which said the rule would mean transgender women, and even potentially other women mistaken as transgender, may be referred to shelters that also accommodate men, where they could face abuse or assault. Some women could lose access to shelters entirely, they added.
www.nytimes.com/2021/04/22/us/transgender-homeless-biden-trump.html