A fun post from a site which used to call itself feminist. Urging violence against women, showing ageism, and offering just the mantra that trans women are women as the justification for why trans women are women.
I came across another article (by Imani Gandy) on that front page, about how it is crucial to write 'pregnant people' and not 'pregnant women' because of inclusiveness. She tells us that we can learn to use the correct language if we try and that we don't have to feel guilty about not having caught the woke train earlier because even she wrote about women some years ago.
I get so tired of people not doing any actual thinking on these issues, and of course being immediately attacked makes debates impossible so the activists remain uneducated.
But the problem with that whole inclusiveness argument is that it would only be correct if all people held a gender identity which is independent of their biological sex. I don't think this is true for most people though it is true for transgender people. I am a woman because I have a female body.
So when the 'inclusive' language turns that body into a gender-neutral one (menstruating people), my own identity is utterly eradicated (taking a page from the trans activists' book here).
I certainly am not allowed to choose it. Only trans and nonbinary people are allowed to have that choice. The rest of us are ordered to be cisgender and told that the sex class which used to be called 'women' is now a mere sub-category of a new identity class 'women', and the most privileged sub-category, too!
That 'inclusive' language turns the female body into a gender-neutral one is terribly problematic (!), because it makes feminism extremely difficult.
Is it 'people' who mostly rape 'people' now? Or is it penis people who mostly rape vulva people? And what would we now call traditional women's rights? The rights of vulva people or bleeders, I guess, given that those rights were actually about the treatment of female-bodied people and not about gender identities.
And what about the gender gap in wages which is actually a sex gap in wages? For instance, nonbinary people will probably earn something less than men and more than women (other things being kept the same in all such comparisons), but that is because the group has both female and male people in it, not because they identify as nonbinary.