@langclegflavoredbananamush
I'm glad that he said as much as he did, but the article also implies that he's not saying all he would like to:
Cracker star Coltrane, 70, said he did not want to go further because, “I don’t want to get involved in all of that because of all the hate mail and all that s*, which I don’t need at my time of life”.
The Wokerati are good at what they do...
By saying what he did -
"I don’t want to get involved in all of that because of all the hate mail and all that s**" - he alerts people to the fact that hate mail and shit is the consequence of speaking up. Hopefully, people will ask why that should be.
He also said "They wouldn’t have won the war, would they? That’s me talking like a grumpy old man, but you just think, ‘Oh, get over yourself. Wise up, stand up straight and carry on.’”
Coincidentally, watching the lunchtime BBC news they were interviewing John Hemingway, last surviving of the 'few', the fighter pilots in the Battle of Britain. Shot down twice already by the age of 20. Lots of footage of young men scrambling into aircraft, exhausted by two months of constant raids. Hemingway crediting his survival to luck, not skill. I found it very affecting.
So when I then read Coltrane's comment, the contrast between this dignified 101 year old (who DID win the war) and those who Coltrane described as "a whole Twitter generation of people who hang around waiting to be offended" and who "wouldn’t have won the war" - well that contrast was so sharp and made Coltrane's comment hit harder than it would have otherwise. What do these people think they're contributing to this world? That little news article just makes them seem so pointless. Sorry, I'm wittering now, still trying to process why that two-minute article on the news has made such an impact.