He has got a nerve claiming the nordic countries as an example to be followed.
For example, in Denmark self-id was brought in without anyone knowing about it at the time. They have had to deal with issues brought up by it as they go along.
One case decided that swimming pool changing rooms are single sex, and legally female males may be excluded.
They have been discussing what to do with prisons, as the case from Sweden brought it up as an issue, but I don’t think there has been a Danish case yet, so no decision has been made.
One horrifying problem has only come to light among radical feminist groups; it doesn’t even merit wider political or media attention. It was only discovered by a woman, reading someone’s master dissertation on inclusion of trans women in women’s shelters. These shelters are used by women in street prostitution, with nowhere else to go when they are not working, and are allocated by the local council and are gender segregated. This dissertation discussed how it was hurtful for a transwoman to be misgendered when a woman would come in, unable to cope with the smell of a man, after having had her body used by men all night. Not one word about how the women were affected. This issue has never been raised in any media, let alone discussed politically.
Issues such as these are only coming to light, when gender critical women can dig them up. The same is true for domestic violence refuges.
This is what happens when you have no debate, or a “non-toxic” (lack of) debate. Gender critical women in Denmark are very much looking to the UK, and taking inspiration from here, but there is so much harm to undo.