@Babdoc
I was v disappointed by the article too - not at all up to the Times usual standard of journalism. Use of the wretched “cis” word, nonsense about “assigned at birth”, and completely missing the elephant in the room - that many autistic children may not be trans at all, but latch onto the gender ideology stereotypes to try and rationalise their feelings of otherness.
How many autistics will end up sterilised and with damaged health, from totally inappropriate puberty blockers, hormones and surgery?
As a doctor, I am appalled that clinics such as the Tavistock would even consider “affirming” these children’s self diagnosis without a thought that it could be totally wrong. I hope some high profile court cases and multi million pound damages claims may halt this juggernaut before more children are harmed. And as an autistic myself, with an autistic daughter, I am grateful we both hit puberty well before all this fad. Our “male” interests in SF, computer gaming, science, trains and maths, and our loathing of fashion, make up and pink sparkles were simply accepted as part of our personalities. Nowadays, I shudder to think what pathway we might have been directed to.
That's me, Babdoc's autistic daughter :D I'm not a mum myself but I care about other autistic kids in that sense, having been one. I've started a Facebook group called Gender Critical Autistics, where autistic people (and families and allies) can talk about this stuff.
Simon Baron-Cohen's been a bit of a disappointment on the issue with his whole "male brains" ideas, but others are good: Tony Attwood's spoken out against transing autistic children, warning that it's not a "cure" for autistic traits (and many of us don't want to be cured anyway, once we learn techniques to manage the downsides of our autism we can get a lot of good out of it, there was a big autism pride movement in the late 2000s and it's a shame to see the community getting misdiagnosed and inappropriately medicalised), and Sue and Marcus Evans have done similar and left the Tavistock.
At the moment I'm planning to look through and write to autism organisations about their stance on the issue: some local services have been really good about advising caution with gender obsession and pointing out that a lot of autistic traits present as gender nonconformity and shouldn't be taken as evidence of a kid's body being wrong, but others like the National Autistic Society seem to have taken the shilling, they ask about gender identity in their surveys (even for autistic people, we don't like language that isn't clearly defined) and had some webinar event that was pretty pro-TRA. I'm hoping the tide's starting to turn, but it would be useful for us to keep an eye on how this is affecting autistics, and other vulnerable groups like adopted children and LGB young people and pre-LGB kids, kids who've survived CSA, and people with comorbid body dysmorphia and EDs, all of whom seem to be disproportionately hit.