If they say cancel culture doesn't exist then surely it doesn't...erm no

[PuppyLove2000]

Huffpost Article forwarded to me today by a friend who said it was a "really great read" Analysis, please.

www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/cancel-culture-harpers-jk-rowling-scam_n_5f0887b4c5b67a80bc06c95e?ri18n=true

wlrnmedia.wordpress.com/2020/07/12/cartoonist-stella-perretts-right-of-reply-to-morning-star-readers/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

In view of my case being featured prominently in the Mail on Sunday’s article “What it feels like to be cancelled” on 12 July, I feel it’s now time I published what I would like to say to the readers of the Morning Star (MS), the newspaper who cancelled me back in February. The paper are unable to publish it, because their hands are tied by the big trade unions who fund them. Notably the GMB and Unison, who pressured them to apologise for printing my cartoon, called ” Endgame”.

Although other unions were braver, and assured the paper they would not join in with the censorship – a shout out here to the CWU, and USDAW.

Some Trade Unions no longer represent their members. Unison is a predominantly female union.

@LangClegTheBeardedVulture

On the subject of unions- has there ever been a women’s union? Set up to recognise the value of our labour, which is often unpaid, and to protect our rights?

I feel like I have heard about something like that, but I can't make the connection as to where.

It's a really interesting idea IMO. However - it might also be contentious around the idea of what counts as "women's labour". Not as in transwomen, but in the sense that I think a significant group would not want to associate that kind of unpaid labour with women. Their goal would be to have men take on half of all that.

A few years ago I went down a rabbit hole and did a lot of reading around the importance and social value of unpaid labour. I think it would be really worthwhile to have an organisation that in some way represented that perspective - it seems like we have representatives for the commercial viewpoint but no other.

I wonder if you could say that groups like the WI functioned, at least to some extent, that way. A lot of the stuff that used to be very common at agricultural fairs and such was focused on work done by women.

It must take a staggering lack of critical thought to praise up in such a wholesale way one of the main proponents of cancel culture when you yourself made you name and living by saying a load of really nasty, offensive things about children, disable people and women. Pull that ladder up behind you, eh, Frankie?

YY. What a colossal oceangoing prick he is.

Imnobody4 - I misunderstood your post at first and thought you were Stella Perrett

Thank you for that link!

"Cartoonist Stella Perrett’s Right of Reply to Morning Star Readers"
Women's Liberation Radio News
12 July 2020
wlrnmedia.wordpress.com/2020/07/12/cartoonist-stella-perretts-right-of-reply-to-morning-star-readers/

"What it feels like to be CANCELLED: It's the mob's weapon of choice - trying to take away their victim's livelihood - it's even happened to the cartoonist for the Communist Morning Star and the organiser of a gay pride parade"
Daily Mail 11 July 2020
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8513897/CANCELLED-happened-cartoonist-Communist-Morning-Star-gay-pride-parade-organiser.html

Has anyone seen this:

www.bariweiss.com/resignation-letter

But no, there’s no issue with ‘cancel culture’ ...

Great letter. I hope she does take legal action. Well done to her for sticking to her principles and resigning.

I particularly like

"But the lessons that ought to have followed the election—lessons about the importance of understanding other Americans, the necessity of resisting tribalism, and the centrality of the free exchange of ideas to a democratic society—have not been learned. Instead, a new consensus has emerged in the press, but perhaps especially at this paper: that truth isn’t a process of collective discovery, but an orthodoxy already known to an enlightened few whose job is to inform everyone else.

Twitter is not on the masthead of The New York Times. But Twitter has become its ultimate editor."

Wow, that is quite a letter.

@ThatsHowWeRowl

Oh I can't seem to attach a pic, it's OJ on twitter crowing about how 'women are more in favour of self id'.

The question asked if people should be able to identify themselves as they like. And I completely agree that they should. I'm actually rather shocked so many said no.

That's light years from, "people should be able to legally change sex based on nothing but their own word, without any significant qualifying period, and immediately have a much stronger argument to access single sex spaces and provisions". And it's not even in the same ballpark as, "should biologically male people be able to use women's communal changing rooms, dorms, and sleeper cabins as a right, as long as they say they feel like a woman?" Ask the public that, and see what answers you get.

When Pink News asked the first question honestly, they found 18% agreed with them. Everyone else was a variation of ARE YOU ON GLUE? And that was why they kept rewording it until they came up with an answer they liked.

Jones knows this. He just doesn't care. What do facts matter, and risks and humiliations he won't ever have to personally deal with, just as long as he can force his views on women?

Never forgotten his delight in encountering a young woman wearing a t shirt that said, "Will suck dick for socialism". Says it all.

Bari Weiss is genuinely speaking truth to power. And it sounds as if the NYT is exactly like academia: full of people who disagree, but are too scared to say so.

LGBT groups in academia are a tiny group shouting at everyone.

Their agenda is forced upwards and crystalises in Diversity and inclusion teams.

Who then demand compliance on pain of cancellation.

In general in academia this is seen as part of a youth trend we have to acknowledge and reflect but the student imperative to replace normal expectations of behaviour with student preferences doesn't get past any actual legal frameworks in reality.

I recommend googling 'Johnny Smugface', it's a funny parody of wokeness, the videos of him discusing JK Rowling made me really laugh, his one on cancel culture is good too.

Here's Bloomberg making their contribution to the fact that cancel culture doesn't exist or, to the extent it does, it's not a problem:

twitter.com/bopinion/status/1283067335184613381

I'm beginning to wonder whether wide swathes of progressive thinking has been seized by a "Do it to Julia" mentality.

“Nick Cannon” is trending on Twitter. The Leftwaffe are moaning that he has been cancelled.

This is actually the funniest thing I’ve seen in 2020. It’s certainly better than any comedy the BBC could come up with these days.

Nauticant
Just seen this thread. Bloomberg is unbelievable, I had a quick look. WTAF has happened to them? Some wag has written You used to be a financial news site

Because everyone knows you can't be worried about more than one thing. If you're worried about freedom of speech, obviously you don't give a crap about the pandemic. I'm sure Bloomberg Opinion were entirely consistent in this stance and also released threads of outrage against the people campaigning for BLM and trans rights and the other problems that didn't magically stop while covid took hold.

I'd say that as a financial new site, Bloomberg can claim woke points at zero costs to themselves. That's the kind of motivation driving this. It's in the same category as "luxury beliefs".

The Bari Weiss resignation letter is an epic indictment of the state of 'liberal' legacy media. Her Twitter feed is full of axe emojis. This ideological fatal purity is on explicit display every day while its proponents and acolytes deny its existence....

As much as I disagree I can understand why they might want to tell someone to fuck off forever. What I can't understand is why that has to be accompanied by axe emojis, verbal death threats, etc. Why is even shunning not enough? Is it just that they're worried the shunning won't take without being backed by the threat of violence?

I remember when "punch a Nazi" first happened and it made me deeply uneasy, seeing so many people I'd known for years gleefully celebrating the idea of escalation to direct physical violence, and how none of them seemed to understand that once that's OK there's never any guarantee that it won't be you next.

What I can't understand is why that has to be accompanied by axe emojis, verbal death threats, etc. Why is even shunning not enough?

I think the violence which is explicit in some of the imagery and words is driven by a fatal purity and a gaze as blank and pitiless as the sun. There is a revolutionary zeal in the Robespierre faction. They think they are morally righteous. They see the world in Manichean terms. Anyone who dissents is an enemy. Not just in a matter of opinion. In an existential struggle against 'evil.' Conservatives. Capitalists. Women. The list of denunciations keeps growing. It is chilling.

Like Saturn, the Revolution devours its children

I'd say that as a financial new site, Bloomberg can claim woke points at zero costs to themselves. That's the kind of motivation driving this. It's in the same category as "luxury beliefs".

YY. You had Forbes doing some idiotic Pink News-alike fluff piece the other day too.