My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

NHS England Head Of Public Participation tells survivors to stay in their lane.

79 replies

Jeanhatchet · 27/06/2020 12:26

A day or so ago I had tweeted at another user that women's single sex services should ensure that the EQ Act 2010 is correctly applied to protect women.

Last night the Head Of Public Participation And Engagement - Olivia Butterworth @LiviBut replied to me in a tweet that

"It has never been an issue or a problem. Unless you have direct personal experience stop jumping on the bandwagon".

When I pointed out I AM a survivor she blocked me. This is really unacceptable. Trolls are one thing. Vicious trans activists are one thing. But a Public Health Official using her account to silence women who have experienced domestic and sexual violence is quite another.

NHS England Head Of Public Participation tells survivors to stay in their lane.
NHS England Head Of Public Participation tells survivors to stay in their lane.
OP posts:
Report
EverardDigby · 27/06/2020 13:41

Another survivor here with PTSD. That's terrible. Gives me very little confidence using the NHS. And her assertions are just wrong.

Report
StealthPolarBear · 27/06/2020 13:42

If she's an NHS employee then she isn't a civil servant. Agree with the principle of what you posted.

Report
Packingsoapandwater · 27/06/2020 13:42

I'd contact your MP about this. The Equality Act is the law. Failing that, I'd contact the Department for Health and flag this up.

Report
Clymene · 27/06/2020 13:48

She is complaining about the proper implementation of the law which protects people with a protected characteristic. She should be sacked.

Report
EverardDigby · 27/06/2020 13:50

Also would she say you had to have direct personal experience of racism to be able to challenge it? Doesn't really fit with the zeitgeist.

Report
AnyFucker · 27/06/2020 13:50

the issue is with men

She got that bit right.

Report
Couchbettato · 27/06/2020 14:11

You'd expect someone with such a prestigious position within an organisation to be somewhat educated, but this is one of the most sense things I've seen come out of the proverbial mouth of someone with so much authority, in a sector designed to protect the health of its people. You know. The nation.

Also, I am not a sexual assault or abuse survivor. Why does that mean that I can't lobby for the protection of women? Do I have to be sexually assaulted before I can ask for protection? Can she even hear what she's saying?

I guess I shouldn't support domestic violence charities, and women's services because my husband has never tried to attack me either...

Report
Couchbettato · 27/06/2020 14:11

Dense. Not sense.

Report
MrsNoah2020 · 27/06/2020 14:16

@SorrelForbes

I'm work in professional and public engagement in the NHS and am appalled at her response to you OP.

Seconded.
Report
ScrimpshawTheSecond · 27/06/2020 14:19

That's appalling.

Report
ScrimpshawTheSecond · 27/06/2020 14:25

Looking at her Twitter - is her remit purely inclusion of LGBT+, or is she supposed to consider any other groups at all?

She's just an anti-feminist, as far as I can see. Interesting that people aren't even pretending that feminism and trans-rights aren't in direct opposition - ' @LiviButt
⁩ lifting voice of trans people is being trolled by feminist groups'

where 'trolling' means 'speaking to', of course. Feminists should just be quite, is the current state of the 'no debate' debate.

Report
OldCrone · 27/06/2020 14:25

'Direct personal experience' of what? I have direct personal experience of being a woman. Does that count?

Report
StealthPolarBear · 27/06/2020 14:27

Of course it doesn't. Now be quiet the women who know so much more about it than you are talking.

Report
littlbrowndog · 27/06/2020 14:30

I know her twitter feed is just so strange

Report
StealthPolarBear · 27/06/2020 14:34

Strange how? As far as I can see it's just pro lgbtq?+ all the way
(but not really l g or b, cos it's all about the t)

Report
Wondersense · 27/06/2020 14:44

What an idiot. You don't have to have direct experience to show concerns about risks. That's like saying to someone who wants speedbumps in their road where maniacs drivers are to reign themselves in because they don't have a dead child yet.

Report
anotherFOIrequester · 27/06/2020 14:45

I've just been invited, as a member of the public, to engage with my local NHS CCG on their transgender guidance. I'm not sure if I can actually go as I'm working at the meeting time, but I will mention this either way.

Background:

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3784009-Are-you-in-Devon-Bristol-North-Somerset-or-South-Gloucestershire-Tell-NHS-your-view-on-trans-guidelines-NOW

Report
MrsNoah2020 · 27/06/2020 15:02

[quote anotherFOIrequester]I've just been invited, as a member of the public, to engage with my local NHS CCG on their transgender guidance. I'm not sure if I can actually go as I'm working at the meeting time, but I will mention this either way.

Background:

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3784009-Are-you-in-Devon-Bristol-North-Somerset-or-South-Gloucestershire-Tell-NHS-your-view-on-trans-guidelines-NOW[/quote]
Unfortunately, CCGs have no control over NHS England - it's the other way round: NHSE are the bosses of CCGs.

So sorry this happened to you, @Jeanhatchet: disgraceful to treat a survivor in this way. If you feel up to it, you could write to the NHS England chief executive, Simon Stevens, at NHS England, Skipton House, 80 London Road, London, SE1 6LH. I would suggest complaining both about Olivia's rude and dismissive treatment of you, and about her bringing NHSE into disrepute with partisan campaigning to undermine the current law.

Report
BovaryX · 27/06/2020 15:09

I would suggest complaining both about Olivia's rude and dismissive treatment of you, and about her bringing NHSE into disrepute with partisan campaigning to undermine the current law

Well said. OP, I hope you are able to escalate this. It is appalling treatment.

Report
JoyFreeCake · 27/06/2020 15:10

QTIPOC? 🤨 Firstly, where are the LGB people who very much do not want a slur "reclaimed" for them and applied to them without their consent, and secondly why is POC randomly shoehorned into what appears to be a tweet about LGBT?

Report
anotherFOIrequester · 27/06/2020 15:44

Yes I know MrsNoah - my (small) hope is they will feed that upwards to NHS England

Report
Aesopfable · 27/06/2020 16:25

why is POC randomly shoehorned into what appears to be a tweet about LGBT?

Because they are hijacking another cause in the same way they did with LGB

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

stumbledin · 27/06/2020 16:38

Because the images of the tweet posted were in a format my computer didn't recognise(?!) I went and found her on twitter which wasn't hard what with the pink hair.

She may say she is tweeting personal opinion but as she states what her job it is unimaginable that NHS England should not be contacted to say what an appalling impression her twitter account gives.

And the final irony, her job is "public participation". I f this is how the NHS carries out participation is it any wonder that trans voices are being heard over women's.

If it was somehow a reversed situation you can imagine that every trans activist would have been asked to bombard her employer with comments about her being biased / phobic.

If you feel able can you tweet to @NHSEngland and make it a public complaint.

Apart from showing empathy for women as patients of the NHS it is worth remember that many SARCs ie clinics where rape survivors are encourage to go without having to involve the police, are run by the NHS.

Are rape victims now to believe that SARCs run by the NHS do not feel obliged to follow EA legislation, which has only just recently been confirmed by Truss to exist and not to be undermined.

This sense of trans entitlement to disprespect women is getting worse.

Report
PearPickingPorky · 27/06/2020 17:04

I can't believe this. The absolute blatant-ness of it.

And the fucking pink hair.

Report
CharlieParley · 27/06/2020 17:18

Asides the utterly reprehensible treatment of a survivor, we know that they know that there are indeed problems with allowing males to access spaces that female service users rightly expect to be female only.

I thought at first these statements that males who identify as trans have been using female-only provisions for years without problems were made in innocent ignorance of the fact. But I have since found that even those service providers who have been informed of various problems with male inclusion in female-only provisions - in their own service and by their own service users - continue to publicly deny those problems exist.

Unfortunately, amongst those promoting transgender ideology and legislation, even if they do have the decency to acknowledge that problems do exist, they minimise them as bad apples etc.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.