Of course tv programmes will present extremes for the "entertainment" of viewers ie so they can judge and bitch about people as you have just done
Being " bitchy" is not really my style..so I'm not sure why you felt the need to make this comment? Says more about your style, maybe?
Did you watch the programme I referenced? I was using it as an exemplar of imposing an ideology to the point it squashes the child's actual preferences or discovery of their own nature. the boy in question was frightened of making his own choices; indeed he seemed not to know what they might be, when confronted with situations out of his mother's control and definition.
Not everything, in my view is about 'patriarchy'. My two boys were lovely, nice natured and not at all 'difficult' as young children. Their father is a gentle man, and a life long vegetarian...and certainly not an archetypal macho man in any way. We didn't purchase computer games which featured fighting or warfare or anything like that......and I ,initially, held to the principle of not buying toy guns or action men etc
Yet still, when out walking in the woods, both the boys would pick up sticks and imitate guns or swords...and play 'stalking', army-type games etc. And when they were in their teens, one of them became very interested in the military ( & used to draw the most finely detailed images of army scenes); the other went on to join his schools army cadet force, and loved it ( mixed school...and there were girls in it too).
Neither son has grown up to be misogynistic or violent...(one is now a DJ and music producer; the other did an MA in International Relations, and is looking for work in international aid agencies or charities)..There were simply expressing themselves in ways which came naturally to them.
Can I add, my daughter, who was the eldest, did not engage in war play of a similar kind, even though she had the most wilful, powerful nature. Boys do, in general, seem more object/outward focused..girls more relational.
To rule out biology and the influence of sex hormones on behaviour, aptitude or attitude is naive, in my view. They are real and powerful, and can be seen in action throughout the natural world. And not all 'boy' qualities are negative and destructive......they just are; and they have a certain natural 'purpose'. that's not to say that as civilised human beings living in a liberal democracy we cannot choose to channel or sublimate our urges and instincts in different ways.