I read the review linked to above, have not not read the book. I am thoroughly confused by the premise here, but it seems to be that (according to a tweet mobile.twitter.com/alisonphipps/status/1242027346439417856) others have said the book’s about the ‘violence white women enact when they organise to fight sexual violence’.
If that’s what it is all about, I am still confused, but also feel exasperated. Should white women just STFU then and not organise against sexual violence? Organise against sexual violence in a different way? It’s bad then is it, if relative privilege or access to justice or whatever can be used to take out sexually violent men?
Do the people critiquing how other women organise to combat sexual violence understand how poorly funded the whole area is, how fucking appallingly low conviction rates are for perpetrators, what little support there are for women who have been raped, attacked, harassed, all of it.? Are they setting up alternative services to do it better and ‘their way’, then?
What’s the idea being promoted here, if it isn’t for some women to just STFU about sexual violence? How will that help women who’s lives and bodies have been harmed? And is this one persons idiosyncratic theory or is there an academic consensus or political movement saying all this?
I am always wary of writing off whole schools of thought without trying to understand what they are saying and trying to understand why anyone would be supportive of those arguments. But I also don’t want to waste my very precious time at the moment reading a load of misogynistic crap. so I might have to leave that dilemma for another time.
Anyway, hope you get well soon Babdoc 


