LGB Conservatives think the Tory party is captured too.

[Fallingirl]

About to go to sleep, and I came upon this.

According to LGB Conservatives (don’t actually know who they are. An actual group within the party?), the Tory party is strongly allied with Stonewall and “may not hold out much longer”.

If this is true, we really are up against it. The only action that springs to mind, is contacting as many Tory MP’s as we can, to let them know cancelling women’s rights will be noticed, and we really do care.

Likewise with safeguarding of children in schools.

I don’t know what this group knows, or where their information comes from, though.

In another thread, In AIBU, someone was suggesting Dominic Cummings is busily undermining the civil service, and hoarding power for himself. We know the civil service is captured, anyone know anything about Cummings?

threadreaderapp.com/thread/1227991141318086656.html

Transexualism was never a threat to women on the same scale, because let's face it - extremely few male people are going to voluntarily part from their penises. The numbers were so small as to be negligible in impact. It's the vapid notion of 'gender' that's putting women and children at risk.

Transexualism was never a threat to women on the same scale

The policies which people are becoming aware of which impact Women's (sex-based) Rights & Safeguarding have been lobbied for behind closed doors for a long time. Many of those who have been at the fore of pushing sex self-id policies are transsexuals.

AngryAttackKittens wrote:

"I'm going to point every "but the nice, harmless old school transsexuals whose movement has been unfairly appropriated by the nasty transgender people" person to this thread from now on.

All the same elements we're seeing now were there in that old BBC roundtable from the 70s with the 4 transwomen, the politician, and the doctor. None of this is new."

Important thread about the history of trans rights activism in UK:
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3463920-Lets-go-back-to-2007

Re the former Mumsnet intern leaker's current job,. I suspect that the pattern of lack of consequences is simply the result of being related to the right people.

Is she someone very special?

Don't think she needs to be very special to benefit from nepotism, really, just a bit posh.

Who is she related to or can’t we say? Wouldn’t want to publish people’s private info obviously because that is not something that decent people would do

If the Civil Service HR departments are 'too busy' to do a simple Google search and you don't offer the employer concerned as a referee, then who would know? I mean, no-one is going to admit to being the source of a data leak in an interview process, are they?

But given the topic of this thread, (which is why we're discussing this individual) maybe it didn't matter anyway, as it was perceived as the 'right sort of leak'. You know, against bigoted women.

TimeLady
Thank you for this information. It is really shocking that someone responsible for a leak like that has been given a position where data confidentiality is paramount.

For the record, this is Justine's response to the data breach, where Emma's involvement is confirmed

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/site_stuff/3226724-Mumsnet-Data-Breach-Q-A

Maybe if some future employer does a search on Emma Healey, Civil Service, this background information will come to light. Actions have consequences; it's not as if she was some disgruntled teenager mouthing off in her bedroom at the time.