The thing with that image I posted.... I am trying to ensure that I post this in the way I want it to come across as I would never want to imply that all drag queens or LGBT people are predators, but if you look at that image objectively:
You have a middle aged faceless male, with hand reaching out to a little faceless preschool boy, who is reaching back and looking up. It really is the sort of imagery that might be used in some sort of 'beware of child abuse' information or advert or something. The faceless male also appears to be dressed as a little girl, with ankle socks and Mary-Jane shoes on. Dressing as a little girl is a well known male fetish. Obviously we cannot see the whole outfit to see what the outfit is, it might not be a little girl. But at the same time the photo has been specifically edited or taken in this way.
Now, I'm trying to think about the thought process behind someone thinking this was a suitable image for an initiative which is all about interacting with children.
On the one hand it could be that these people are just so unaware of child abuse, safeguarding, boundaries etc that they genuinely don't see anything wrong with that image and that it wouldn't even occur to them that it could be perceived as inappropriate. And it's just a totally innocent image. But then surely people with that level of lack of awareness of working with children should not be involved with children?
Another thought process (and we all know that safeguarding is about thinking about what is unthinkable) is that someone is trying to blur boundaries of what is acceptable. Trying to encourage parents to think that a male displaying a fetish around children is acceptable because that's what 'being inclusive' is. Trying to encourage children to think that a strange man reaching out to them and taking their hand is acceptable because that's what 'being inclusive' is. Trying to encourage the public to think that questioning this kind of thing is homophobic or transphobic because its just someone expressing themselves?
I don't know, I'm trying to put things as objectively as I can after what happened with LangCleg, but I can't see an image like that on a website about an initiative directed at pre school children and not give my thoughts on it.