I really get your points MrsTerryPratchett and I feel awful for the child who's been permanently harmed by her parents choices, and the question now of 'would she be further harmed to be permanently removed from her parents'.
My struggle or conflict is when that child grows up and realises what her parents have done to her, how will she feel?
Don't we always remove children from abusive situations for safeguarding?
And given that the article states
"She said the couple had shown a lack of remorse and had not provided any insight into what had occurred."
If this child is returned to her parents, and is nurtured to believe FGM is normal and healthy, will she perpetuate, or be coerced in to perpetuating, the abuse on any female children she may go on to have?
If education hasn't worked, and threat of sanctions haven't worked, how do we break the cycle?
But then I read your posts, specifically I can see that a judge could think, 'the only utterly dreadful, abusive thing they will likely ever do has been done so if I jail them all I do is put a child in care who has mostly loving parents and traumarise her further'.
I'm left feeling like do I / society have the right to remove children from parents for 'their best interests' in these kinds of cases, and where does this end?
Yes, my arse has splinters.