On Newsnight she said "if there is somebody who is clearly not transitioning, who is somebody who is very obviously still physically male changing within a group setting in a female changing room, that's inappropriate because it makes people feel uncomfortable"
So she gets it to that extent. That there's an issue of women understandably feeling uncomfortable around a biological male in this way, and she says that's not ok.
What she hasn't clicked on is that she's thinking Jazz Jennings, India Willoughby, and this is not the reality she is enabling to happen. She needs to do a lot of unpacking and a lot more research.
It's any male. At any stage of transition or not. There's no gate keeping, and women having feelings of discomfort is absolutely not ok or not something permitted to them.
And for many women, no matter what the stage of transition, they are still going to feel uncomfortable. What then? When do their feelings stop mattering? Who decides? What about the women who are not able to use any space with any male at any stage of transition? What about provision for them, is it ok to exclude them?
I don't think Sarah would agree it's ok, but Sarah is forcing this agenda forward and representing a Rape Crisis that prioritises the need of male people to be included and treated in female centres even at the expense and exclusion and trauma of those females. Not because their needs cannot be met in any other way, but because the presence of those females in a female only space even at the expense of those females is so important to those males.
As a PP said - Sarah's never going to square this circle.