And the mention yesterday about 'women's rights not being affected by religion and culture', which is actually about setting the ground to exclude women who won't undress around males and have a very inconvenient protection in law. Do they seriously think people won't get wise to this positive herd of Trojan horses cantering around?
This raises the question though of whether the desire is another ideology or for schools to avoid ideology and leave that to families. Because there are two ways this can go, I think.
One is arguing against gender ideology because we want some other ideology to win and be taught in the schools. When people say they want schools to teach kids that any sexuality is just fine, that's an ideological approach, and not one everyone will agree with.
The other option is for schools to avoid ideology, and while they might still teach about being kind and getting along with other kids and families, it would involve refraining from making any statements about what the right way to think about sexuality might be.
In the former approach there will be winners and losers, there will be people sending their kids to school who feel they are being indoctrinated, that they are stepping on the parental role. And there's a sense where, if we agree that's ok, sometimes we might have to put up with being the losers, if we can't convince people.
But the latter approach, we've really moved away from it in the last, maybe 20 years, though in a quieter way. We've taken it for granted that schools should be teaching about this stuff with the express idea that we want to influence what those kids grow up to believe. I think it might be difficult for many people to move away from that way of doing things.