To engage with the 'substance' of her criticism of somerville's article (talk about tilting at windmills):
That my bio points to my account also being my personal account
No it doesn't, it says: Professional, political and personal tweets are hard to untangle.
in which I am at liberty to share jokes in conversations with friends
The tweets in the article were:
- A tweet at Dr Stock implying that she's unfuckable because she's a transphobe.
- A tweet to stonewall criticising someone who suggested she was homophobic for acting like a white knight.
- Tweets to stonewall about 'lezziewashing' and denying she was drunk.
- A tweet to another critic saying 'who calls themselves homosexual'.
I'm sure some of the other people included in those tweets are friends and I believe her that many were meant as jokes. None of them are directed solely to friends, none are purely personal and it's hardly unreasonable to question whether they add up homophobia.
That he might not be in the best position to appreciate the cultural currency, backstories and delivery of said jokes;
If Hines thought Somerville had misinterpreted her 'humour' she had the opportunity to explain that when he asked her for comment. Instead she sent a rude reply indicating she felt above criticism.
That cherry picking messages and presenting them out of their full context and conversation is very poor journalism indeed
I got the context cited above from the article. Where possible he shows preceding tweets. Again Hines had the opportunity to provide further context.
hat my few (non-personal) glib tweets may be contextualised in relation to the (extremely personal) vitriol that I have faced for a very long time from mass anonymous twitter accounts each time I post in support of trans rights
I have followed Hines for a while, I can't think of a single example of abuse. Let's say I've missed some, how does that make her posts any more professional or less homophobic?
That he has a history of writing in support of gender critical feminism and is clearly ideologically motivated.
So.... allowing personal beliefs to cloud your work is bad? Except for Hines: such petty commentary will certainly not hamper my work of 20+ years in support of trans rights.
If Somerville's work is questionable because he's published several articles on this topic, what are we to make of Hines' work?