It’s interesting that many of the same arguments being used by the trans community are the same ones used by feminist years age. Those arguments will also be used in the future for any minority looking to become ‘equal’ within society...
Take the argument regarding pronouns. There’s was a fight to stop gendered job titles such as postman. Why is it such a leap to get rid of gendered titles full stop?
But that's not what is being demanded. Not that we get rid of sexed pronouns but that we misapply.
For a while I thought misapplying pronouns to people who identified as a member of the opposite sex was just a kind thing to do. I found myself increasingly uneasy until a few months back I read Pronouns are Rohypnol a very powerful piece that analyses the almost subliminal message the wrong use of pronouns sends.
One example goes like this.
"She's very upset that the women don't want her in the communal showers"
Most people would react very differently to this sentence referring to a man who identifies as a woman compared to the factually accurate:
"He's very upset that the women don't want him in the communal showers".
In the first instance you might wonder why the other women are being so mean, whereas your reaction to the second is "Well, dur!"
Regarding efforts to make job titles more egalitarian if not unisex, feminists wanted a recognition of the fact that women were doing jobs that hadn't previously been open to them. It was a campaign based on the fact of women in the workplace. They demanded terminology that better reflected reality. In contrast, the current campaign for the misuse of pronouns demands that we ignore reality and miscommunicate.