I wonder if Penny had to say this, to refute the incorrect PN article, but without saying that? The PN one stated that she was doing an investigation into something totally different that does not come to mind at present..I remmeber though, that I thought when reading it 'no thats not what the investigations meant to be about!' so know it was not the same thing..
Either way IF its an unbiased investigation, its of course welcomed. The GIDs update is just, disheartening and quite bizarre. Does not give me faith in them at all that they seemingly did not realise adding more kids 3 years in might change stuff.
That mermaids correction is just [shocked]
Since publication this article has been amended to remove a comment from Mermaids, a charity supporting transgender children, which incorrectly represented their position on hormone drugs. The article stated that they consider these drugs ‘can subject a young person to distressing bodily changes that can lead to an increased risk of anxiety, depression, self-harm and suicidal ideas’. In fact, the full comment from Mermaids refers to their belief that it is ‘waiting times’ for these drugs which can be the cause of distress. We are happy to make their position clear, and apologise for the error.
What they were said to have said sounded very reasonable tbh. Showed they understood that this was not an easy process at all and it could distress kids, and basically acknowledging the downsides rather than just crowing about the 'good' of fast treatment or whatever. Should have known it was a misquote and they would be quick on the case to correct it. The correction makes them sound a bit derranged to be honest. So much so that it hald makes me wonderif they were purposely misquoted just for the correction to show it up!