It seems McK's university adopts a post-tenure review system:
Post-Tenure Review
- Post-Tenure Review Schedule
Each tenured faculty member must undergo post-tenure review at least once every sixth year, except that a tenured Associate Professor or Librarian III may elect to undergo review for promotion to Professor or Librarian IV, respectively, instead, with the understanding that the posttenure review clock is reset by the promotion review.
Faculty members holding the rank of Professor or Librarian IV are eligible to seek a superior post-tenure review rating in their sixth year in rank at the College or any subsequent year subject to two conditions:
(1) A faculty member may not receive a superior post-tenure review rating more often than every sixth year, and
(2) A faculty member who makes an unsuccessful application for a superior rating may seek a superior again the next year but may not apply for a superior rating more than two years in a row. Additionally, a faculty member seeking a satisfactory rating (who has not subsequently been promoted to Professor) is eligible to pursue a superior rating the following year and the subsequent year should
that faculty member’s initial application for a superior rating be
unsuccessful.
(Rev. Aug. 2017; Aug. 2018)
- Rating of Candidates
a. Ratings of a candidate will take one of three forms:
(1) Superior Rating
The superior rating is awarded to candidates who continue to perform at the level expected for the promotion to the rank of Professor, or Librarian IV, in accordance with the standards of the Faculty/Administration Manual.
(2) Unsatisfactory Rating
Candidate has exhibited evidence of habitual neglect of duty, which means consistently and regularly failing to fulfill the terms and conditions of appointment, as laid out in the Faculty/Administration Manual's "Termination of Tenured Faculty Members 'for Cause' and
Termination Procedure."
(3) Satisfactory Rating
All other candidates.
I wonder if the words 'unsatisfactory rating' are begining to be muttered.