I've just sent this which is a bit of a mn cut and paste job from previous posts but feel free to amend and use
Dear Ian
I'm writing to you in support of Professor Michele Moore.
I am terribly concerned about the increase in these academic witch hunts for anyone who expresses a difference of opinion about gender and sex in this current climate, especially those made in support of natal born women.
It is my understanding that academics such as Professor Moore should be free to express opinions and comment of matters of public interest. If academics are hounded out of editorial posts, it will have a cascading effect of shaping what is published (or not). Surely that makes the quality of academic publishing poorer?
My concern is also that this insidious campaign extends not only to trying to get Moore removed, but refusing to review papers for the journal as long as she remains in post.
It is hard enough to get peer reviews as they are created with goodwill and not paid - so to start suggesting that one should not review if one editor holds different views to you is a slippery slope. The only consideration when deciding to do a review (aside from if you can spare the time and most people accept as necessary for academic scholarship to be rigorous) should be if you are qualified in the field.
I am trying to think of a parallel where I would refuse to review for a journal because I disagreed with the politics of an editorial board member. I do not think it would cross my mind to check. It is a concerning trend.
It seems to me that someone has gone out of their way to work how to damage Moore for speaking publicly on this topic, presuming that her university is supporting the right of its academics to freedom of thought and speech and trying to get her fired is not an option.
Please consider this view as it is one of many in the academic community and beyond but so many (women especially) are too frightened to say what they really think about this matter for fear for reprisals.
I urge you not to support this unnecessary and unpleasant attack on Professor Michele Moore.