She's asked about whether there is any truth in the accusations that Stonewall has shut down debate around trans rights. She replies that they are constantly engaged in difficult discussions. She agrees that prisons and sports need to be discussed, but she then says there's a 'reluctance to concede that there is space for civility' and civil conversation is lacking. She says that some of the things that have been said to and about trans people, and have been said 'on all sides' haven't helped the discussion.
She thinks the prisons issue should be judged on a 'case by case' basis, and says that is the view of both Stonewall and the MoJ.
She says it's not 'legitimate' to say that 'all transwomen are men masquerading as women in order to exploit a system'. She says 'we' can't engage with a position that 'starts on the assumption that all transwomen are fundamentally deceptive and out to harm'.
She says that the discussion is not 'based in the facts of a situation'. She agrees that we should be able to discuss whether the Olympic Committee have made the right decision regarding participation of transwomen, but we shouldn't be framing this as 'should transwomen compete in sport?'.
So she either doesn't know what the gender critical position is (because she has refused to engage with anyone who disagrees with her), or she is deliberately misrepresenting it.