Caroline Farrow Support Thread

[GeordieGenes]

Caroline, I am honestly almost in tears looking at your Twitter feed tonight.

Her kids have been doxxed by the good doctor.

She is continuing to receive harassment from TRAs. Someone has just sent a pizza to her house.

We all need to get behind her. They think she's a weaker target because of her Catholic views, I'm sure. Let's get on Twitter and report everyone that is sending her abuse.

They are trying to push you till you break Caro. I've said it before and I'll say it again I don't know why they hate you so much. I don't know why you.

I know you've blocked some of them now. Block them all. Personally don't engage with their sockpuppets. Slam up the defences. I think this is so horrible.

I wish I could take you out for a coffee and cake.

What did (or did not happen) back in the 20th century is of no relevance whatsoever

When someone in the 20th century was convicted for threatening an individual with a golf club, and that same someone is continuously making wee comments about visiting people's hometowns to play golf it is very relevant.

Please don't [as I am sure people wouldn't] supply any details of Caro's kids to one to the instigators of her continued malicious harassment.

stephLDS18

There’s evidence on this thread about everything claimed. Nobody here is ‘bored’ reading about this abusive criminal past. We are horrified. There is no defamation. There is evidence here on this thread of the disgusting jokes and blatant attempts to intimidate and harrass. We see right through your BS.

No, I don’t think people with violent pasts ( including indecent assault ) should get to come here and harass women, deny their past and minimise the impact of their criminal behaviours. Those kinds of people make me feel physically ill. My father abused me 30 years ago, it’s as relevant now as it was then. Abusers who come here and try and say otherwise, are repulsive and have no place on a feminist board.

FWIW I think your husband is incorrect Caro.

@ItsAllGoingToBeFine

So, someone is convicted of (for argument's sake let's say affray) in 1999. The eventual sentence (as opposed to the original sentence) is (hypothetically) a conditional discharge. You are aware of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (especially the parts relating to subsequent defamation)?

Am I right in thinking that your line of argument is that such a hypothetical individual can never make reference to playing golf, visiting a golf course, or anything golf related? Do I understand you correctly? Or is it the case that the real issue here is that a group of individuals (again hypothetically) who seek to find anything bad with another group of individuals (let's call these individuals transgender) latch on to an ancient spent conviction and use that to smear, target, harass, and defame someone on the basis of nothing other than an incident going back many decades? That could not possibly be true could it?

However, in the interests of balance and defending freedom of expression (which I know you all love and defend so much), I am willing to consider any evidence of actual threats being made. Please provide the evidence, otherwise you are just defaming people.

Caroline Farrow I would reiterate my earlier advice

Not a hypothetical individual. It’s a real person and you can’t deny your criminal past.

caroline

You need to do what is best for you and your family

Give over Steph. Everyone can see what you are doing. Lots of people here are very familiar with male pattern abusive behaviour.

And please don't @ me.

Nobody answers to you on here SH.

Leave Caro and her kids alone.

Leonardo DiCaprio won an Oscar for "What's Eating Gilbert Grape" in 1994.
Try telling him "that's irrelevant now".

@JessicaWakefieldSVH

Let me be very clear, if your comments about "criminal past" refer to me then you need to understand very clearly that I have no current criminal convictions. Kindly understand this. You can drone on about it all day long. The law is very clear. And there is legal action currently underway to identify the individual who published the original post on these forums back in November 2018. That individual is likely to be identified via court order very soon indeed. That is all I intend to say on the matter (for now).

I’d recommend everyone ignore the gaslighting abusive individual who has turned up on this thread. We do not answer to anyone like that.

Don’t @ me or engage with me again.

jessica

Just ignore

As someone mentioned recently. (.cant think who)

This is a support thread

So lets keep focused on caroline and not any random posters

"Gaslighting abusive individual"?

Seriously?

You want debate don't you? I suggest certain individuals are shocked that they are being called out publicly for their own inappropriate behaviour. The time for giving people a "free ride" is over. I have nothing to hide and I will no longer be tolerating it. I have witnessed the effect that the smears, attacks, abuse, and defamation have had on their intended targets. Those individuals are at their wits end and deserve to be publicly defended on these forums in the same way that other members set up threads to "support" the very individual engaged in the behaviour of which they complain.

Awesome crosspost jessica

Why do it then Stepho?
Why repeatedly bring up golfing in relation to gender critical women or their events?
Why even mention golf?

Caroline speakers of the truth often upset those who do not want to hear it. You have far more support than they do 💐

Legal action against a mumsnetter by a TRA.
Now, why does that neither surprise nor worry me at all.

Jessica, this is a public forum. As I said earlier I will engage on exactly the same basis as any other member. You have made reference to me on these forums and I have an entitlement to reply. If you do not like it then I suggest not referring to me. Again, it is all very simple really.

Keep in mind that now this thread has become problematic for a certain person there will be repeated goads to get intemperate responses to trigger a deletion by MNHQ.

This thread needs to stand. It's both informative and illustrative.

Caroline speakers of the truth often upset those who do not want to hear it. You have far more support than they do

Absolutely. The public outrage when you were phoned by the police was overwhelming and supportive of you. Don’t be scared off by the intimidation, I’m certainly not