Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

"I cannot think of any more obviously fundamental human right than the right of a man to have sex with his wife’

156 replies

Ratatouille76 · 01/04/2019 15:39

www.google.com/amp/s/www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/sex-man-wife-judge-court-protection-learning-difficulties-a8849211.html%3famp

Am speechless. Men have the right to have sex with their wives?

OP posts:
Smotheroffive · 16/04/2019 23:36

Hmm despite using the same click bait...Confused

Smotheroffive · 29/04/2019 20:50

"Wednesday 3rd April 2019

Women’s Aid responds to judge’s comments in court that it is a “fundamental human right” of a husband to have sex with his wife, as reported in the Guardian.

Nicki Norman, Acting Chief Executive at Women’s Aid, said:

“Rape in marriage has been illegal since 1991. The judge’s comments in court that it is a “fundamental human right” of a husband to have sex with his wife are outdated and misogynistic, showing a complete disregard for women’s rights. The judge’s primary consideration in this case must be the woman’s safety and the protection of her basic human right to live free from degrading treatment such as rape as set out in the 1988 Human Rights Act.

“Research shows that women with a long-term illness or disability are more likely to be victims of domestic abuse compared with those without a long-term illness or disability (ONS, 2018). While one in five women supported by domestic abuse services have experienced sexual abuse as part of a pattern of domestic abuse (Women’s Aid, 2019). We know from our work with survivors that a woman may be experiencing control, threats and intimation from her partner which makes it difficult, if not impossible, for her to consent to sex in that relationship. The public’s outrage at the judge’s comments in this case clearly show that some judges are out of step with wider public opinion on cases of violence against women and girls. These judges must be held to account for their old-fashioned and deeply sexist attitudes and there must be investment in training to ensure that everyone within the justice system has stepped forward into the 21st century"

SonicVersusGynaephobia · 30/04/2019 08:14

If only the Women's Aid spokeswoman had given this a little more consideration rather than just reacting to the misleading clickbait headline.

SisyphusDad · 30/04/2019 08:28

Then he has an extremely limited imagination.

BingandFlop2019 · 30/04/2019 08:42

I think you're all taking it out of context. It's also poorly worded. I think he means LEGAL RIGHT. In general. Not against a woman's wishes

LordWheresMyShoes · 30/04/2019 09:10

Bing ... Even if it were taken at face value without the case... Do you really think that a judge, somebody who rules on human rights, is fit for work if they cannot think of a human need or a legal right that is more fundamentally important than sex? How about right to eat, appropriate warmth and shelter, freedoms from torture or abuse?

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread