So:
- Dislaimer: This link is clearly click bait and I have no confidence it will go ahead in practice. However, poses a useful thought exercise.
- Say a person, somewhere, has proposed a TIM James Bond.
- Proposed TIM actor/ess (depending on your grounding) quotes "there’s no reason why there shouldn’t be a transgender Bond. We’ve seen too many men in hero-type roles and women playing second fiddle.”
There's a discrepancy in third wave discourse when Trans identifying men consistently disregard the validation of Trans identifying women, who by their own volition cannot be centred within feminism.
I think this goes overlooked within both rad feminist and trans rights circles when:
- Philip Bunce scoops an award for top 100 women in business
- Rachel McKinnon wins gold
- Caitlyn Jenner becomes 'woman of the year
- Our local women's officers are trans
And the hypothetical first trans bond automatically becomes TIM, when if ideology fits, a trans bond would naturally be TIF.
Can anyone in the name of balanced debate think of equivalent TIF's, who have assumed male privilege since transition (socially or otherwise). I've a string suspicion the bias within their own community keeps them from all accolades.
I'm aware I often disappear after making posts like these; sorry folks, demanding job is my weak excuse.