Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Radio 4 'The Art of Now' Sohrab Ahmari argues that contemporary art is being stifled by an obsession with identity politics.

27 replies

R0wantrees · 03/01/2019 12:01

Just been on:
"The art world is in a crisis, an identity crisis. That’s according to writer and art critic Sohrab Ahmari in this impassioned polemic, He argues that contemporary art is being stifled by an obsession with identity politics.

Identity politics in art is certainly nothing new, nor is the criticism of contemporary art. However, Sohrab argues that art’s current infatuation with identity politics is going too far.

Whether it’s artwork dealing with race relations, sexuality, gender, power or privilege, Sohrab says a desire for political point-scoring in the art world has far-reaching consequences - not only does it affect the quality of the artwork itself, but it also fuels narcissism, social division and political conformity.

Speaking to artist and critic Alexander Adams, Sohrab hears how identity politics drives artists to only create work about their own lived experience and results in a bland wash of politically correct slogans.

So what’s driving these artists to pursue identity politics? Sohrab speaks to the current crop of young impassioned artists to find out how and why identity politics features in their work. They suggest that art can and should be a tool for bringing about societal change.

So what’s at stake? Central to this programme is Sohrab’s concern that identity politics threatens art’s traditional search for truth, freedom and beauty. Moreover, in the current climate where activists are calling for certain artworks to be destroyed, he argues that, far from bringing the art-loving public together, identity politics is increasingly dividing us."

www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/live:bbc_radio_fourfm

OP posts:
EJennings · 04/01/2019 07:44

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

GobBluthsSegway · 04/01/2019 12:53

As an academic I am much more concerned by the activism that’s currently taking place around “liberating the curriculum” which is calling for inclusive syllabus that covers issues of gender identity (often sex isn’t mentioned at all), race, disability, sexual orientation, etc,
and which is reflective of what the student body supposedly is today, regardless how awkwardly this sits with the discipline’s productions and concerns. A module on - for example - eighteenth century literature cannot logically accommodate these kinds of concerns in any sustained way, yet that is what we are under pressure to do, to distort historical developments to fit with students’ perceptions of themselves

I can understand that, in my experience it leads to nothing but tokenistic addons on a module anyway.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread